Laserfiche WebLink
.d_ .__ __ .___ - - <br /> October 3, 1977 <br /> The regular neeting of the Everett Board o.`. Adjustmenr was held at 7:00 p.m <br /> in khe City Council Chambers, City Hall, Everett, Washin9ton. • <br /> Mr. Baird p:^esided; Mr, Russell, Mr, Kristiansen� and Mr, Black were present; <br /> • • Mr. Berg was absent, <br /> Under. old business, Mr. James Dupler of 320 Olympic Blvd, Everett, WA 98203, <br /> withdrew his applicatiott. . <br /> The following items are under new business: <br /> 1. L. 7�. Akers and Howard Moore who are applying £or 3312 Kromer. They <br /> are rec7uesting permi.sion to const.ruct a single family residence to within <br /> ten (10) feet of the front property line rather tha.i the required twenty (20) <br /> Peet. Also to allocr for a deck to er.tend six (6) f.eet into the rear yard <br /> setback. <br /> LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10 except the west 85 feet th�=reof and Lot 11 <br /> except the west 65 feet the�•eof, Bloc}: 783, Stanford <br /> ' � � � - Land Company's Add, to Ewerett <br /> ADDRESS: Approximately 3312 Kromer <br /> 7,ONING: R-1 Single Family Low Density Residence y , <br /> Mr. Dan Bovey, 4619 Baker Drive, represented Mr. Moore and Mre Akers. <br /> Mr. Bovey madn_ the following statements: <br /> • 1. • Thal• the proposed new single f�unily residence will be 22� feet <br /> • from ground level. <br /> 2. There have been other varian�es granted in the inanediate area <br /> for similar reqaests. <br /> 3. Also that they are proposing a residence that will minimize the <br /> loss of view to the neighbors. � <br /> There was some opposition from the neighbors. :he main objection was the <br /> obstruction of view that they have been enjoying foz the past msny years. <br /> After visually viewinq the subject property and considering all the facts <br /> and tr_stimony, it was moved by Ms. Russell, seconded by Afr. Kristiansen, <br /> and unanimously carried, that the variance be qranted for the following <br /> reasonr. . .• <br /> � 1� It does comply with Section 1?.70.060 of the EVerett !tunicipal <br /> Code� Paragraph 2, which says that such variance is necessary for <br /> the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial �roperty right <br /> of the appellant possessed by the owners of other .proper.ty in <br /> , the same vicinity or zone, <br /> { <br /> I <br /> � <br /> �.r .. . ..' _ <br />