Laserfiche WebLink
. ,, _" �. _� ,� ,_ , ,.,. ._,.,, �„_ �� ,., ��� <br /> � <br /> i <br /> 8.5 COAIi�ItiN[CATIONS <br /> 8.5.1 Threshold <br /> Most communication facilities are exempt from SEPA teview. This SEPA analysis covers all aboveground <br /> communication facilities provided that vieH� analysis is completed in the Special Property Use permit process. <br /> This analysis �oes not cover any sr.ucture that the FAA determines may have a significant adverse affecc on <br /> na��igable �irspace eround ��aine Field Airport. <br /> 8,3.3 dlitigstion �Ieasures <br /> 1. .\II communication lines must be installed underground, (SEPA Public Services end Land and Shoreline Use <br /> Policies) <br /> 2. The Special Propem Use permit process for abo��eground utili[ies musc include analysis of'impacts to views <br /> from the proposed facilities. In addition, Special Properry Use permits shuuld only be appro��ed when the <br /> design of the abc�veground communication facilities are compatible«�ith nearby structures and/or screened <br /> from view. (SEPA Public Services and Land and Shoreline L'se Policies) <br /> 3. �ntennae und tu�tier proEosals and all proposals for s[ructm•es to be ndded to the top of esisting buildings: the <br /> FA?� must be no[itied prior to issuanre of a determinution of consistency to determine if the structure��•ill <br /> affect navigable airspace. All recommendations ot'the FAA must be complied��ith. (SEPA Land and <br /> Shoreline L'se Policies) <br /> 8.6 PUBLIC WA1'ER SCPPLIE5 <br /> 8.6,1 Threshold <br /> The analysis in [he FI'arer Svsrenr Pla„ projec�ed the overall future peak-hour demand for thc area a[2,7 gpm/acre <br /> (approximately 4,000 gpa'day peak flo�l�j, and assumed fire flow requiremencs of approximately 3,500 gpm for <br /> commercial and indusvial.-manufecturing uses. Based upon the proposed design of the water sysrem, any <br /> de�'elopment using more than 2.7 ;pm'acre hos the poten[ial to affect water pressure on other sites, Additiona{ <br /> analysis will be reqaired for develupment proposals widi a peak hour demand abo��e 2,7 gpm/acre and/or a fire Elow <br /> requirement of 3,500 gpm ur greater. The additional enalysis may be as simple as calculations completed by the <br /> Public 1'�'orks Depar[ment prior to a pre•application meetin¢on a specific development propos�l. Th�additionel <br /> analy sis mus[ determine how the proqosal's wster demand �vill affett the entire wnter supply and distribution <br /> s�stem. Projects with no additional rnajor irtiprovements needed and no adverse cumulative impacts on the water <br /> supply and disvibution system are covered by this analysis. <br /> The 2.7 �pm'ecre is an overall average peak how demand assumed for planning in large aress such as the study <br /> area. Ho��ever, ihere ��ill undoubtedly be site•specific proposals H�ich larger demand. For exampie, large imgation <br /> ,��stems can exceed 50 epm�acre demand. Other land uses wi[h demands much loa'zr than 2.7 gpm/acre,such as <br /> warehouses, are assumed to occur to offset the higher demand lend uses,resulting in an overall area wide average <br /> of 2.? gpm/acre. <br /> The iinpacts of construction of the new wa[er line ro servicz development west of Japanese Giilch were not eevered <br /> in thc FIS. Additional SEPA analysis is required to review alternative routes for the line which will miaimizz thz <br /> impac�s of the preposal. <br /> 14I �� <br />