3616 24TH ST 2016-01-01 MF Import

t � � l ' BOARD OF ADJUST4SII-IT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER VARIANCE N0. 4-88 `£ Based upon the written requeat for a variance from r.he City's zoning code by: ` f -_ Mike Karpenko ! I 3616 24th St. .,F ' '� Everett, WA 98201 =:tc: , +; hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," for a variance from E.M.C. ; .�;� , 19.16.050(B), Side Yards, and 19.42.040(D) Rear Yards, r.o allow: ;� � cousr.rucr.ion of a garage rhar. would replace a ahed rhat ia currently ``;� ' on the aide property line and r.hree feet from r.he rear property line. ' ,�, on the £ollowing described properr.y: " East 50 feer. of Lota 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 532, Mitchell Land & , � i Improvement Co. Firar Addition to Everett j ; commonly known as: 3616 24th Sr., The Board of Adjustment, following a public hearing on eaid applicar.ion held ; .f,,�{ � on April 4, 1988, and further having reviewed all teatimony, makes the :;��'�;' following Findinga, Conclusiona and Order: ` 5 �j VARIANCE CRITERIA: ` j' Findings and Conclueiona: I � Criterion A1: That r.here have been exceptSonal or estraordinary �i circumetances or conditions applying to the sub�ect �' property or as r.o the intended use thereof that do not apply generally to other properr.ies in the eame viciaity I �,! ur zone. � ' a. Find3ng: The Applicant wiahes to demolisli an exieting 12' s ' ��; 20' ahed that hae ao setback on the east aide and ie aet back r.hree feet from the rear property line and replace it with a 24' a 24' garage that would have a aia inch setback on r.he east ' side and a three foot setback from the rear property line. The exiating single family strucr.ure is centere.d on the 50' a 10�' " lot, and so acceas r.o r.he garage ia limited r.o an eaieting thirteen foot Wide driveway on the easr. side of r.he house. If � r.he five foor. setback was met, ir, would make it more difficult ; to accesa the garage. If the site wae vacant, the ho��ae and ' garage could be deaigned r.o meer r.he setback requiremente. b. Conclueion: Ther.e are exceptional circumstancea applying to the sub ject property aince r.he location of the existing single , family structure limita r.he design posaibi.lit+;.s. Crirerion #2: Thar. such variance ie neceaeary for the preservarion and • enjoymenr. of a aubsr.antial property right of the appellanr. posaessed by the owners of other propertiea in rhe same vicinity or zone. a. Find'_ag: Other property owners in r.he area have garages and there are other strucr.urea in the north end that do not meer setbacka. b. Conclusion: The variance is neoessary for the enjoymenr and '�' preaervar.ion of a property right possessed by othera in the � vicinir.y and zone. ��.; 1 � ➢ 1 ; �; , i �