Laserfiche WebLink
l' ' 'I <br />� i; ,�., ,�..., <br />; Ii <br /> � <br /> I <br /> ; <br /> i <br /> , <br /> I <br /> ' STAFF REPORT TO BOARD OF ADJIIST!ffi�TT I <br /> VARIANCE /4—SS <br /> DATE: April 4, 1988 ' <br /> i ' <br /> �! Applicant: Mike Karpenko <br /> 3616 24th St. ' <br /> Everett, WA 98201 <br /> �I , <br /> ;� <br /> Location of Property: 3616 24th St. <br /> i <br /> n�quested Action: Variance from L�.M.C. 19.16.050(D) Side �, <br /> Yards and 19.42.040(D) Rear Yarda to , <br /> ii allow conatrucrion of a garage that ' <br /> I i would replace a ahed that i a currently � <br /> � on r.he side properr.y line and threc , <br /> i! feet from the rear property line. ' <br /> i <br /> Eaisting Zoning: R-2, Single Family High Den.aity ' <br /> i� Residenr.ial � <br /> ' 'I Existing Land Use: � <br /> s <br /> � <br /> I Adjacenr Land Uae/Zoning: North: Single Family/R-2 I; <br /> '� South: Single Family/R-2 I <br /> East: Single Family/R-2 <br /> ' , West: Single Family/R-2 i <br /> �i <br /> �, L�ahibite: <br /> � 1 Vicinir.y/Zoning Map <br /> �' 2. Site Plan <br /> i; , <br /> , 3. Narrative Statement <br /> '� FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: � <br /> I�i J_. That there have been exceptional or eztraordinary circumstances or I, <br /> conditiona applying to the eubject property or as to the intended uae '� <br /> thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the eame ; <br /> vicinity or zone. <br /> Find3ng: 1'he Applicant wiahes r.o demoliah an existing 12' x 20' shed I, <br /> that hae no setback on r.he easr aide and ie aet back rhree feet froa I <br /> r.he rear property line and replace ir with a 24' a 24' garage that , <br /> ' would have a aix inch aetbEck on the east aide and a three foot ; <br /> aerback from the rear property line. The existing single family <br /> ar.ructure is centered on the 50' x 100' lot, and so acceas to the '. <br /> garage is limited to sn exisr.ing r.hirr.een foor. wide driveway on �he ; ! <br /> east side of the houae. If r.he five foot setback was mer., it would � <br /> make it more difflculr. to accesa the garage. If r.he eite was vacant, I . <br /> the house and garage could be deaigned to aeet the setback I :�'� <br /> requiremente. ' "`'` <br /> ;s <br /> Conclusion� There are escepc±onal circumatancea applying to the <br /> aub�ect proper.ty since the location of r.he exiating single family � <br /> ar.ructure lim.irs the deai@n possibiliriea. <br /> 't; <br /> � � � ��t!:s. . <br /> ;7 <br /> �I , <br /> I � `'< <br /> I I <br /> I j <br /> I <br />