Laserfiche WebLink
A pe{:ition signed by seven otimers of property in the immediate i`1 <br />area of the requested rezone objected i:o the variance. <br />� . <br />r�. Wm, g, Ingram representing the signers of the petition stated <br />the following objections: <br />1. Contrary to the zoning code <br />2, Area is zoned R-1, single family and nota has a <br />non-conionniny aupleh on the subject property. <br />3. This will create a traffic hazard on 35i:h St. <br />4, Mr, Christensen applied for a similar variance in 1960 <br />and was denied. , <br />It was moved by Mr. G`hampion, seconded by Mr. Dickson and une.nimously <br />carried to deny tl�e request of Mr. Chrisiensen because of the following <br />reasons: <br />duplex. <br />1. Property is being utilized to its maximwn by tl�e existing <br />2, Change o:c the land use plan. <br />3. No extraor9inary circumstances presented. <br />4. The granl:ing of the requested variance e�ould be <br />granting a special privilege to one individual which is not beneficial <br />to the surrounding properites. <br />Mr. Cronin, acting C77airman, announced that there wi7.1 no� be a <br />Board oi- Adjustment meei:ing for the month of August 19G9. <br />On motion i:he meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. July 7, 196�. <br />Secretary <br />'� <br />, �. <br />0 <br />