Laserfiche WebLink
_________________________� ._________________________�___________________________ <br /> i <br /> ' WATT6UN 9 . 6 PROPOSED/COMPARISON REPORT 04/20/80 <br /> FILE: O: \\1999\\9914\\CD\\BUILDZNG2&3\\E-BLDG3 .W5 HOUSE ID: <br /> Site Address : Analyst : <br /> City, St Zip: Jurisdiction: <br /> Homeowner: Utility: <br /> Builder: Rudd Development Co. , Inc <br /> House Type: Multi-family <br /> Weather Data: Seattle, WA Comparison File : <br /> Climate Zone : 1 Heated Floor Area: 5705 ft2 <br /> The PROPOSED design *COMPLIES* with �997 WA State Energy Code. <br /> REFER�NCE PROPOSED COMPARISON <br /> COMPONENT PERFORMANCE 1206 1178< *** BTU/hr-F <br /> ENERGY BUDGET 10 . 12 10 . 18 *** kWh/ft2-yr � <br /> ______________________________________________________________________________ � <br /> PROPOSED DESIGN COMPONENTS <br /> Component Description Value X Area = UA <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> On Grade Slab R10 2' horizontal F-0 .700 290ft 203 . Q <br /> Floor R19 vented Joist 16oc U-0 . 041 1142 46 . 8 I <br /> Gla2ing @13% **Milgard Vinyl Window U-0 . 511 768 . 8 392 . 9 <br /> Doors Wood 1 3/8" , solid flush U-0 .390 151 . 0 58 . 9 <br /> AG Wall R13 STD Lap Wood U-0 . 082 4175 342 .4 <br /> Ceiling R30 blown Attic STD baffled U-0 . 036 3722 134 .0 <br /> Infiltration Standard Air Sealing ACA-0 . 350 51777ft3 (331 . 6) <br /> ---------------------------- <br /> Proposed UA 1177 . 9 <br /> Struc Mass Light Frame, Sheetrock walls M- 3 . 000 5706 17118 <br /> ---------------- ------------------------ ---------------------------------------- <br /> _______________________________________________________________________ <br /> Items in parentheses not included in COMPONENT PERFORMANCE totals . <br /> ** Denotes non-standard values - check calculation of thermal value. <br /> _____________________________________ Page 1 <br /> ___________________________________ <br /> w/� <br />