Laserfiche WebLink
Erich O. Tietze & pssoc. 2067750236 P. 03 <br /> . I <br /> � . t <br /> � - '—MEMO (continued) ]framei, Ch &Ma 0. Inc. '• <br /> � <br />' Perhaps the areas designated as biofiltratton swales should be marked in the e1d prior <br /> i - ko grading for bullding pads,parking lots,and traffic lanes. � <br /> � 5. The design of swales number one and two mises some questzons. For�exa le, there <br /> appeats to be 760 feet of swale depzcted on the plans, while the applicant dai 239 feet <br /> of swale. It is difficult to unde�stand how the system will work without rvater ollng at <br /> the "Y" created by the intersection of the two swales. Tn addition, is the pplicant <br /> counting the same swale twice? From the informaHon provided in the table of <br /> Bio8ltratlon Swale Data, it appears that there is actually 239 feet of swalg, alth ugh it is <br /> not depicted on the drawings. If the swale is to be eounted twice, the s'wale ould be <br /> � proportionately larger downstream frpm the "Y". � <br /> ' 6. With regard to the planting schedule for the wet pond. We recommend a mix f species <br /> rather than a monoculture in facilities of this type. Ivlany of the spede� reco ended <br /> in the table of Additional Vegetation for Biofiltiation Stvafes, found on the me plan <br /> sheet, would be approprtate for planting on the edges of wet ponds. ' <br /> I <br /> , <br /> Erosion Co�lrol P(an " ; <br /> .� <br /> The erosion control plan depicted on Sheet 1 of 1 has some issues that need to be a ressed. <br /> Specifically: � <br /> ; <br /> , <br /> 1. T,he ditches that are shown on the south side of the site traverse through the d line of <br /> several of the majoz trees that are to be preserved. Essent[ally, the'drip ' e of a <br /> ' ' ����� coniferrnu tree does not represent t�e extent of root growth, CeneraUy spea 'ng, the <br /> � � root ball extends up to two times the diameter of the drip llne. The trees wlll robably <br /> ' �j�` not survive such treatmeat., or may be severely weakened, posing a futu e saEety <br /> hazard, { <br />� <br /> . � <br /> 2. Straw bale check dams, shown tluoughout the ditch system on the site, are no oriously <br /> � ineffective. when used as check dams because of poor placement, maintena ce, and <br /> deterioration. Other methods acceptable to the City of fiverett Departaient Public <br /> „ ��� Works should be considered. In additlon, a achedule of maintenarice s uld be <br /> lnduded for all check dams, sumps, and erosion control faciliries. { <br /> 3. The outfall for the perforated ptpe on the sediment pond should rest atop � bed f gravel <br /> �a� or straw to minimize the formation of riwlets. Some provision for m�inte nce, as <br /> , Q;�" well aa a schedule, should be provided. <br /> 4. Once the rockeries are constructed on site, where will water be conveyed? �Ch►ce uilding <br /> , pads are constructed, and rockedes are in place, how will water traverse t{�e sit 'I'here <br /> will still be problems wtth erosion once the site has been graded. An idga of ow site <br /> water will be conveyed once the preliminary grading is accomplished would heIpful <br /> and may serve tq circumvent erosion and sedimentation problems before they o cur. <br /> ; <br /> , <br /> � <br /> _ ± <br /> �^ 7 <br /> � <br /> i <br /> Page 2 � <br />