My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12115 19TH AVE SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
19TH AVE SE
>
12115
>
12115 19TH AVE SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 3:24:30 PM
Creation date
4/2/2017 1:57:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
19TH AVE SE
Street Number
12115
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1038
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 28, 1988 <br />Bill Garing <br />W.S.D.O.T. District 1 Sta <br />15325 S.E. 30th Place <br />Bellevue, Washington 9800. <br />Attn: John Herron <br />7•7 f!--, . <br />r .--F— <br />�c <br />r <br />Subject: S.R. 527; Metco Development <br />everett <br />Pe <br />the Evergreen <br />CITY OF <br />eve reit <br />PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT <br />3200 CEDAR STREET <br />EVERETT. WASHINGTON <br />98201 <br />Dear Sir: <br />Attached is the proposed channelization plan for the Metco Apartment <br />Development at 121st Street S.E. and S.R. 527. The improvements shown are for <br />an interim three lane improvement. Necessary right-of-way and commitment to a <br />future L.I.D. for a five lane roadway are also conditions of this development. <br />Apparently, I did not understand the direction you and Miguel Gavino had given <br />the City regarding the need for the State to review all channelization plans <br />for developments on S.R. 527. We thought no review was needed as long as the <br />individual channelization conformed w..th the final channelization concept <br />along that route. A channelization clan is being prepared for the entire <br />route and will L sent to the State for their approval. Future developments <br />would be reviewed by the Ci- fclr thc.J.r conformance to the approved plan. <br />There are numerous development; proposed along this one mile stretch of <br />S.R. 527. Should the City continue to send channelization plans to the State <br />for their approval? <br />The other issue, as we discussed, is the roadway section. The City has <br />adopted roadway sections for various classes of streets (copy attached). Is <br />it sufficient to require developers to construct to the City's Standards or <br />will the State need to review each development's roadway improvements for <br />conformance to the State's Standards? <br />I would appreciate it if you could walk the attached Metco Development Plans <br />through the necessary reviews. We also need to meet and discuss again the <br />State's review requirements for future developments along S.R. 527. <br />AUG 1 198 <br />STREETS REAL PROPEPTY/ TRANSIT MOTOR BUILDING PUBLIC UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TRAFFIC ENGR/ <br />259.3820 LI.D.•s 259.8803 VEHICLES 259.9800 SERVICES 259.8800 INSPECTION 259.8800 SIGNAL MAlr rENANCE <br />259-8800 259.8002 259-8800 Water Sewer 259.8800 259-8800 <br />Drainage <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.