Laserfiche WebLink
Everett LDS Parking Lot Expansion <br />Storm Drainage Report <br />3. Off -Site Analysis <br />Downstream Drainage Description <br />Please refer to Figure 4A and 4b — Off -Site Conveyance Exhibits to aid in the following discussion. <br />The proposal is to convert a portion of the site from pervious (lawn) to impervious. To mitigate for this <br />change, a strcambank erosion control system (detent;on pine with control structure) is being installed to <br />supplement the existing detention pipe system previously installed for the site. The results are that less <br />flow will be released during large storm events to the existing downstream systcm. However just to be <br />careful we have done some sizing calculations to establish that the existinp, system has capacity. <br />The Upstream Basin of 30 acres +/- has the ability to generate significant flow. However some of that <br />urbanized area is mitigated with stormwater systems. All of the flow from this area is concentrated at one <br />Catchbasin on the North Side of 90" St. SG south of the church site. The potential flow from the this <br />upstream basin is huge for a 100 year storm event (>30 cis). However it is limited as it all has to get into a <br />single 12" pipe with about 3' of head available. The amount of water this inlet can handle is about 6.5 cis <br />(See Figure 3A, page 11). At the south side of the property this pipe was upgraded to a 15 pipe, and this <br />pipe size continues through this property and through the property directely to the north. The next <br />constriction in the system happen at the last pipe in the system leaving the property. At this point the flow <br />from the property is added to the system. The exit pipe is quite deep and is a 15" pipe, its inlet capacity is <br />15 cis (see second diagram of Figure 3). The available capacity is then 15 cis — 6.5 cis or about 8.5 cfs. <br />The addition of flow from the existing portion of the property (ignoring the reduction effects of the <br />existing detention system) is 3.25 cis and the flow from the proposed development is only 0.78 cis (again <br />ingnoring the proposed detention system) which totals less than the 4 cis. The pipe system has available <br />capacity even in the case where both systems wot:ld be completely non-functional. <br />�-a <br />f� <br />f. a` • f <br />Cniehhasin at Connection point to Existing system <br />P:\2006\06113 Everett LOS Parkin0 LOt\Text\S1orm Reporlc\08113 OmmaOe Report R.Sea 01.10.0a.Goc Page 6 of 36 <br />