My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9930 19TH AVE SE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
19TH AVE SE
>
9930
>
9930 19TH AVE SE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2021 11:43:27 AM
Creation date
4/2/2017 3:14:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
19TH AVE SE
Street Number
9930
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Report <br />Home Base Warehouse - Everett <br />July 31, 1997 <br />NCA File No. 213497 <br />Page 9 <br />Although structural loading informatiop was not available at the time of this study, based on our <br />experience with similar structures supported on similar soil conditions and for the recommended <br />allowable soil bearing pressures, we estimate that the potential total settlement is less than 1 inch, and <br />that the potential differential settlement is less than 3/4 inch over a distance of about 20 feet. <br />Lateral Pressures <br />The lateral pressure acting on retaining walls is dependent on the nature and density of the soil behind <br />the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement which can occur as backfill is placed, wall drainage <br />conditions, and the inclination of the backfill. For walls that are free to yield at the top at least one - <br />thousandth of the height of the wall, soil pressures will be less than if movement is limited by such <br />factors as wall stiffness or bracing. We recommend that yielding walls supporting horizontal backfill <br />and not subjected to hydrostatic forces be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 35 pounds per <br />cubic foot (pcf). Non -yielding walls supporting horizontal backfill and not subjected to hydrostatic <br />forces should be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 55 pef. These lateral soil pressures do not <br />include the effects of surcharges such as traffic loads, hydrostatic pressure, inclined backslopes, or other <br />surcharge loads. Surcharge effects should be considered, if appropriate. We can provide <br />recommendations for surcharge loads as they become apparent, if desired. <br />Lateral loads can be ref by friction between the foundation and subgrade and the passive resistance <br />acting on the below-er: undation. For the latter, the foundation must be placed "neat" against the <br />undisturbed soil, or bat '% ,. A with a clean, free -draining, compacted structural fill; and the ground <br />surface adjacent to the footin, must be level for a distance from the footing of at least 2 times the depth <br />of the footing. We recommend !hat lateral passive resistance be calculated by using an equivalent fluid <br />density of 250 pcf. An allowable coefficient of friction between footings and the subgrade of 0.4 may be <br />used, and should be applied to the vertical dead load only. These values include a factor of safety of 1.5 <br />and 2.0 for friction and passive resistance, respectively, applied to the estimated ultimate soil strength. <br />The above wall pressures assume that the wall is dra;ned and hydrostatic pressures do not develop. Wall <br />drains are discussed in the Subsurface Drainage sub -section of this report. <br />NELSON-COUVRETTE 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.