My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 8:34:34 AM
Creation date
4/3/2017 8:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
10/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF EVERETT FISCAL ANNEXATION ANALYSIS <br /> Exhibit 9 <br /> Total Deficit/Surplus as Percent of Total City Budget <br /> 20.0%- --------— _._.._�.. -- — — — <br /> - - - •No Annex <br /> 15.0% <br /> Scenario 1 <br /> 10.0%• <br /> -Scenario 2 <br /> 5.0%' <br /> - - - - - - . - , - - Scenario 3 <br /> 0.0% <br /> �= r <br /> 211. _ - 2012 -2015 201: 2021 2024 2027' Scenario 4 <br /> -Scenario 5 <br /> -10.0% <br /> Scenario 6 <br /> -15.0%' <br /> -Scenario 7 <br /> -20.0%— -- — — — — --— -- ----- <br /> Source:Berk&Associates analysis, 2008 <br /> The key challenge the City faces in considering various annexation options is that the type and mix of <br /> land uses in all of the potential annexation areas generates lower revenues per capita than the current <br /> overall city average. The City must apply its current tax structure to the annexed area, allowing for little <br /> control over the revenue received. As evident in Exhibit 8, the revenues per capita for the annexation <br /> areas are much lower than for the City of Everett. <br /> EL Final Report:October 2008 Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.