My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 8:34:34 AM
Creation date
4/3/2017 8:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
10/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF EVERETT FISCAL ANNEXATION ANALYSIS <br /> Exhibit 18 <br /> Scenario 3 - Everett Projected Property Tax Millage Rate <br /> Assuming Annexation in January 2009 <br /> $2.500 <br /> • <br /> $2.000 ' • <br /> $1.500 • • • • <br /> $1.000 • • <br /> $0.500 <br /> $0.000 11 i 1 1 1 1 1 T I I 1 1 1 I I II <br /> 2009 2013 2017 2021 2025 <br /> Source:Berk&Associates analysis,2008 <br /> Because of the method for calculating a city's property tax levy (1% of the previous year's levy plus <br /> new construction), the amount of new construction in a city is important to a city's ability to limit the <br /> erosion of its millage rate over time. A typical measure of the level of new construction activity in a city <br /> is the percent of a city's total assessed value that comes from new construction in a given year. For <br /> both the current City of Everett and the potential annexation areas, construction rates are based on <br /> development assumptions for parcels that are vacant, redevelopable, or already planned or permitted <br /> by Snohomish County. For the City of Everett, the projected average rate of construction in the City is <br /> estimated at approximately 1.3% of assessed value in 2008. <br /> Due to lags associated with annexation and levying, the City would not begin to receive property tax <br /> revenues from the annexation area until 2010. Between annexation and 2010, however, the City <br /> would receive revenues associated with the County road and fire district levies. Assuming annexation <br /> is completed January 1, 2009, the City would receive these levies for the full year of 2009, currently <br /> estimated at approximately $3.2 million for Scenario 3 and $6.7 million for Scenario 4. The road levy <br /> revenues must be limited to transportation-related capital expenses. To offset these capital revenues, <br /> the City would have flexibility to adjust the portion of general fund subsidy currently allocated to <br /> capital back to the General Fund during 2009. <br /> Retail Sales Taxes <br /> One of the key revenue sources that cities rely on is Retail Sales Tax. However, of the areas analyzed <br /> in Scenarios 3 and 4 (Eastmont, Hilton Lake, Rugg's Lake, and Larimer) only Rugg's Lake has some <br /> commercial development capacity (approximately 8,000 square feet). Retail development is <br /> estimated to generate approximately $200 of taxable retail sales per square foot, and office <br /> development approximately $25 per square foot. These per square foot estimates are based on an <br /> overall average for "typical" retail activity. Actual sales tax impacts could be higher or lower depending <br /> on the actual types of tenants that might locate in these areas. <br /> Final Report:October 2008 Page 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.