My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 8:34:34 AM
Creation date
4/3/2017 8:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
10/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF EVERETT FISCAL ANNEXATION ANALYSIS <br /> 6.4 Operating Cost Analysis <br /> Ongoing Costs <br /> The fiscal model estimates changes in the cost of services based on relationships between direct <br /> services, such as maintenance workers or planners and underlying demographic and community <br /> changes such as increases in population, housing units, commerc'al activity and land area. <br /> • Costs are broken up into labor and non-labor categories <br /> • Non-labor costs in each department are driven by the number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) in <br /> that department <br /> Drivers for FTEs in each position within all City departments are variable in the model, and fall into <br /> one of four categories: <br /> • Fixed. These positions do not change over the planning horizon (for instance, there will always <br /> be one Police Chief). <br /> • Direct.These positions are driven directly by changes to the underlying land base of the city, such <br /> as population or employment. The relationship between demand for services and the underlying <br /> land base is determined based on the types of services each position provides. For example, parks <br /> maintenance staffing is directly related to the number of park acres that must be maintained. <br /> • Indirect(by Position).These positions are driven by staffing levels of one or more positions in a <br /> specific department For instance, a Police Commander is related to growth in the number of <br /> Police Officers. <br /> • Indirect (by Department). These positions are driven by staffing levels of one or more <br /> departments. For instance, an Accountant position in the Finance Department is related to total <br /> new staffing levels in most other City departments. <br /> General Assumptions <br /> Annual salary and wage escalation is assumed to be 3.5%, while annual benefits are assumed to <br /> grow at a rate of 6.0%. The assumption regarding benefits escalation accounts for the possibility of <br /> growth in overall benefits costs above inflation due to the expected continuation of benefit cost <br /> increases primarily related to health care costs. <br /> Impacts to City Staffing <br /> Annexation in Scenario 3 is estimated to increase City staffing by approximately 37 FTEs, or 4.8%. <br /> Along with staffing increases attributed to City growth, this brings total City staff from the current 767 <br /> FTEs to 834 FTEs in 2009. <br /> Annexation in Scenario 4 increases City staffing by an estimated 79 FTEs, or 10.3%. Including staffing <br /> increases for City growth, total City staffing is estimated at 875 in 2009. <br /> [ri Final Report:October 2008 Page 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.