My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 8:34:34 AM
Creation date
4/3/2017 8:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
10/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF EVERETT FISCAL ANNEXATION ANALYSIS <br /> Scenario 3. In the event of annexation under Scenario 3, the City would serve the annexation area <br /> from the existing Fire Station 7, which is located within the current city limits to the west of the Hilton <br /> Lake annexation area. In order to do so, the City proposes adding new positions that would serve both <br /> the annexation area and the southern portion of the City and keep staff from becoming stretched too <br /> thin with the addition of the new area. An estimated 18 additional FTEs would be needed, but these <br /> positions would serve the southern portion of the City as well as the annexed area. These FTEs <br /> include 4 Battalion Chiefs, 4 Captains, 4 Firefighters/Drivers, 4 Firefighters (because of the elimination <br /> of some overtime costs this results in a net new cost of 1 Firefighter position), 1 Fire Inspector, 1 <br /> Medical Services Officer, 1 Training Officer, 1 Community Outreach Specialist, and 1 Office Assistant. <br /> Additional one-time fleet, apparatus, and equipment costs are estimated to be approximately <br /> $358,000. <br /> To account for the fact that these positions will serve the current City as well as the annexation area, <br /> the cost of these positions has been modeled as being shared between the existing City and the <br /> annexation areas. In most cases the cost has been allocated based on a population percentage basis <br /> between the southern portion of the City and the annexation areas. The exceptions are two office <br /> positions which are apportioned based on population using total population within the City, rather <br /> than only the southern portion, since these positions will provide service to the whole City. The other <br /> exception is the Battalion Chief, estimated to spend one quarter of time serving the annexation area <br /> and the remainder serving the southern portion of the City. Costs for this position have been allocated <br /> accordingly. <br /> Scenario 4.Assuming annexation under Scenario 4, the City would acquire Fire Station 12 located in <br /> Larimer from Fire District 1. This would require staffing an Engine with 12 FTEs including 4 Captains, 4 <br /> Firefighters/Drivers, and 4 Firefighters, the costs for which are fully attributed to the annexation area. In <br /> addition, this scenario would include support from the existing City Fire Station 7 which would also <br /> require added staff with shared costs between the City and the annexation area. The shared FTEs are <br /> the same as those listed in Scenario 3 with the exception of 1 additional Office Assistant. Additional <br /> one-time fleet, apparatus, and equipment costs are estimated to be approximately$570,000. <br /> Recently state law was revised such that upon annexation the City takes responsibility for fire services <br /> and will also receive any Fire District levy revenues that are collected from the date of annexation until <br /> the beginning of the following calendar year (for more detail see ESSB 5836). As discussed in Section <br /> 6.3, we have assumed that in 2009, the City will be responsible for fire expenditures within the <br /> annexation area and will also receive Fire District 1's estimated levy collections from that area. In this <br /> case, as with police services, there may be a period of transition in which the City and Fire District 1 <br /> negotiate how fire services will be provided. <br /> Automatic Aid. Considering that there are some pockets of annexation areas that may be time- <br /> consuming and difficult to reach for Everett Fire Department, both scenarios would require an <br /> automatic aid agreement with Fire District 1, and potentially with Mukilteo and Lynnwood. Everett Fire <br /> Department expressed concern over their ability to provide a consistent level of service across the <br /> new City boundaries unless an automatic aid agreement was in place. This agreement would need to <br /> be negotiated by the parties involved. <br /> EL Final Report: October 2008 Page 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.