Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF EVERETT FISCAL ANNEXATION ANALYSIS <br /> 7.4 Transit <br /> From examining the maps for Community Transit, it appears that there is currently no extensive bus <br /> service in Eastmont, Hilton Lake, Rugg's Lake, and Larimer. Upon annexation of these areas, the City <br /> of Everett would face a policy choice of where and how much transit service it would provide. <br /> According to Everett's Transit Department, sales tax revenue is a major funding source for its services. <br /> Snohomish County now levies 0.9% sales tax for Community Transit, while Everett levies a 0.6% <br /> sales tax for transit. Annexation would shift the sales tax revenues from Community Transit to Everett, <br /> with taxpayers paying less in sales taxes. <br /> Assuming annexation under Scenario 3, the City is likely to receive an estimated $256,000 in sales tax <br /> revenue for transit in 2009. Under Scenario 4, the estimated increase in tax revenue is approximately <br /> $448,000. <br /> 7.5 Capital <br /> The capital impacts from annexation are somewhat more difficult to discern. While this analysis does <br /> estimate the equipment costs associated with new staff, it only addresses infrastructure costs on a <br /> qualitative basis. The annexation model does estimate some additional capital revenues available after <br /> annexation. The model provides estimates of the revenues from the Real Estate Excise Tax and the <br /> capital portion of the Gas Tax, which are held aside as available funding for capital infrastructure needs <br /> in the contemplated annexation areas. <br /> These revenues for Scenarios 3 and 4 (including City) are displayed in Exhibit 25 below. Scenario 3 <br /> amounts to an estimated $207 million over the next 20 years in present value terms and Scenario 4 <br /> results in an estimated $224 million. Upon annexation, as capital costs are fully fleshed out, there <br /> likely to be more needs than there are resources coming from the annexation area. This situation is <br /> comparable to the base City situation, which has unfunded portions of its current capital needs, and <br /> unless there are significant immediate capital infrastructure needs in the annexation areas, the long- <br /> term funding situation is unlikely to be dramatically different than the status quo. <br /> Exhibit 25 <br /> Estimated Capital Revenues for Everett (millions), Scenario 3 <br /> current 2010 2015 LUAU 2015 <br /> REET 6.04 8.04 11.08 14.99 20.66 <br /> Gas Tax 0.80 0.96 1.21 1.50 1.85 <br /> Total 6.84 9.00 12.30 16.49 22.51 <br /> Estimated Capital Revenues for Everett (millions), Scenario 4 <br /> current 2010 2015 LUAU 2025 <br /> REET 6.04 8.74 12.02 16.24 22.32 <br /> Gas Tax 0.80 1.05 1.32 1.63 2.01 <br /> Total 6.84 9.79 13.34 17.87 24.33 <br /> Source:Berk&Associates analysis,2008 <br /> [: Final Report:October 2008 Page 47 <br />