My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008/11/19 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
2008/11/19 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 10:18:07 AM
Creation date
4/3/2017 10:17:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
11/19/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
overlay, many citing the neighborhood character as the reason they bought their houses <br /> and often recounting the extensive work they have done to restore their homes. Nine <br /> persons opposed the overlay, generally opposing additional regulation and fearing <br /> greater cost for repairs or additions. In addition to other public comments already <br /> mentioned, a petition signed by 22 persons was presented supporting the overlay, but <br /> requesting that the southern boundary of the proposed overlay zone be moved from <br /> California Street to Everett Avenue. Their reasons for this modification were that Everett <br /> Avenue is a high traffic arterial that naturally divides the mixed-use area south of <br /> California from the mostly single-family area to the north and that many of the residents <br /> south of Everett Avenue are renters, not home owners, creating a different neighborhood <br /> culture. Although several Historical Commissioners expressed understanding of the <br /> rationale to move the southern boundary to Everett Avenue, the Historical Commission <br /> unanimously recommended approving the overlay as proposed, with a southern <br /> boundary of California Street. <br /> The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed overlay on October 21, <br /> 2008. Two overlay boundary alternatives were presented to the Planning Commission <br /> for consideration, one with a southern boundary of California Street and one with a <br /> southern boundary of Everett Avenue. For this hearing 11 additional persons supported <br /> the overlay in written or oral comments, and a new petition with 80 signatures was <br /> submitted in to Planning Commission in support. Three additional persons opposed the <br /> overlay at the public hearing. Planning Commission unanimously supported the overlay, <br /> but there was discussion about which boundary alternative to support. A motion to <br /> recommend the southern boundary at California Street was defeated by a 3 to 4 vote. A <br /> second motion to recommend approval of the overlay with Everett Avenue as the <br /> southern boundary passed unanimously: 7-0. <br /> The minutes of these meetings and all written public comments are in this packet. <br /> Guidelines and Standards <br /> The Neighborhood Conservation Guidelines describe the various elements of the homes <br /> and neighborhood which create its historic character, including the streetscape, size and <br /> proportion of the buildings, roofline, shapes of windows and doors, exterior materials, <br /> vehicular access, parking, garages, and rear yard infill dwellings. The Historic Overlay <br /> Standards set specific zoning standards to maintain the historic character of the <br /> neighborhood, such as building height and setbacks, building modulation, roof pitch and <br /> garage placement. As an incentive to retain existing historic buildings, construction of <br /> an infill residence is allowed in the back yard in the R-3 and R-4 zones and in the R-2 <br /> zone on lots large enough to accommodate a duplex. <br /> The Guidelines and Standards apply to all development which requires a building permit. <br /> They are designed to be applied together and establish specific criteria so development <br /> review by the Historical Commission and City staff will not be arbitrary. <br /> Studies nationwide and recently in Washington State show that properties in historic <br /> districts appreciate at the same rate or a faster rate than properties outside the districts. <br /> Research on insurance rates shows that historic overlay zone designation does not <br /> increase home insurance rates. Some companies actually look favorably on the <br /> designation because properties are better maintained. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.