Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Jan Meston <br /> From: Tina Guzinski [tina.guzinski@gmail.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:22 AM <br /> To: Jan Meston <br /> Subject: Riverside Historic Overlay Comments <br /> October 19, 2008 <br /> Jan Meston <br /> City of Everett Planning and Community Development <br /> 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Ste 8A <br /> Everett WA 98201 <br /> Re: Comment on the Notice of Historical Commission Hearing (Riverside Historic Overlay Zone) <br /> Dear Ms. Meston: <br /> I am stating my strong objection to the approval of a Riverside Historic Overlay Zone. <br /> I have owned my home since 1993. I fell in love with it and this neighborhood on sight. Over time, I <br /> have managed to make my improvements, creating my ever-changing vision to make a home that is <br /> comfortable, inviting and all while respecting its historic character. I believe that I have achieved much <br /> of that. I also realize that I still have a long way to go. Over the last 15 years I have watched other <br /> homeowners do the same. The people here take great pride in their homes, the history and the <br /> neighborhood. The Historic Overlay Zone is redundant and will only serve to deny us our rightsn as <br /> homeowners in making choices and decisions regarding our homes. <br /> My home received the 2008 Monte Cristo award from the City of Everett's Office of Neighborhoods. I <br /> find it very ironic that the things that make my home attractive would be in violation of the proposed <br /> standards for the Overlay. My neighbors, who received the Monte Cristo in previous years, would also <br /> be in violation of these standards. <br /> One thing that has repeatedly struck me about this proposed overlay is the arrogance of the people <br /> behind it. I attended the informational meeting over at the Everett Station a few weeks ago. I cannot <br /> help but expect that that arrogance would continue on in the life of the commission. Here are my <br /> reasons for objecting: <br /> Three people decided to stand in front of each of the 450 homes with a clipboard and decide what was <br /> right and what was wrong with the house. They would have been better served to knock on 450 doors <br /> and ask the residents what they thought of the idea. I have been doing this since that first meeting and I <br /> am not finding support for the overlay. These people-- not knowing, nor caring, of my plans, ideas, <br /> personal circumstances, financial considerations, my home-- decided what was right and what was <br /> wrong. That is supreme arrogance. I would encourage those few people to move to a home in a <br /> neighborhood association, where residents choose to be ruled by others,if that is their preference. <br /> We were told repeatedly that the commission would'guide'us and'encourage'us in our decisions and <br /> selections. As a fully-functioning adult, I neither need nor desire guidance or encouragement to make <br /> the'right decision'. I realize that there are people who can not fathom that,but it is fact. And even more <br /> 10/20/2008 <br />