Laserfiche WebLink
December 6, 1978 <br />Rr. Tracy Gill <br />13123 48th Ave. N.P. <br />marysville, t.7A -)8270 <br />on O MR. <br />Uu U�c o B 197E <br />CM OF EVERETT <br />I11SPV: 011 ppr- <br />Subiectt Review of Drainage Plan Proposal for the L'verett Free Methodist <br />Church, 9506 - 7th Ave. >.r. <br />Dear Tracy, <br />The review of your revised drainage plan proposal was conpleted December 5, <br />1978, and is being returned to you. <br />The proposal covers 3-1/2 acres for an approximate predevelopment ru.h-off of <br />137 cubic, feet. A 20 minuto storm discharging at a rate of D.2 cubic feet <br />per second requires a storage capacity of 3000 cubic feet. The plan review <br />shorn a discharge of 0.25 cubic foot per second hilhich requires 3680 cubic <br />feet of storage canacl.ty. Another matter that needs attention is that the <br />area under development appears to oxceed 3-1/2 acres; therefore, the <br />calculations must be corrected accordingly. <br />Also, nu details of orifice wore provided and the pencilled corrections <br />and additions to the Plans am unsatisfactory. In addition, the plane are <br />required to show protection fr(a blockage by siltation (such as rock work) <br />at t:n outlet pipe) also required is the nonding capacity and necessary <br />details about the ck-tentionj the ,ontrol is to tx placed in the pond <br />rather than in the narhinq area( and safety fencl:,q is required on pond <br />slonos in excess of 3 to 1 ratio. <br />2`he proper procedure for resubnittal of tie revised plans is to deliver <br />4 sets of plans and calculations to th. Duilding Department which in located <br />on Olympic Drive at Madison. Plans shall not be delivered directly to the <br />Public Works Department. <br />I have enclosed, for your convenience, an acceptable format for Submittal <br />of the required drainage plan. Additionally, an illustration on the <br />a�mrvpriate form has been Provided based on the 3-1/2 acre proposal rather <br />than on tick larger area. <br />