Laserfiche WebLink
, . � .-- <br />� <br />' BOARD OF AD.7USTMENT <br /> FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND URDER VARIANCE NO. 3-91 <br /> Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning <br /> code by: <br />' Applicant: William Belshaw <br /> 2111 Rucker Avenue <br /> Everett, WA 98201 <br />' _ Location: 1414 12th Street <br />�, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant, " for a variance from Section <br /> 9, requiring a minimum 2� foot front setback and a mini�r,um five Poot <br /> side setback along the alley. The proposed two story single family <br /> residence will have a six foot front setback from '�2th Street. The <br /> footprint of the hnuse and garage will be less than 1,200 square feet <br /> in area on a 3 ,00o square foot lot. An attached single car garage is <br /> proposed to Ue built to the alley. <br /> PINDINGS 7�ND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> Criterion No_ l.: <br /> That the variance is necessary beca�:se of exceptional or <br />� er.traordinary circumstances rPgarding the size, shape, topography, or <br /> location of i:l�e suUject property; or the location of a pre-existinq <br /> impiovement on the subject property that conformed to the zoninq code <br /> in efPeci when the improvement was cc �structed. <br /> a. Lindinqs_. The vacant lot i.s 3 ,000 square feet in size which <br /> doc� noL- meel the minimut!m lot size requirement of 5,000 square <br /> fect. riost lots within the neighborhood do meet the 5,000 <br /> se{uare foot 1ot requirement. The 12th Street right-of-:aay has <br /> excess property that serves as an additional setback from the <br /> road. 'Che :;ide lot line faces the alley which usually abuts <br /> rear loi: ]..ines. <br /> t,. Conclus.i.on•s:. There are exceptional or extraordinary <br /> circumstances regarding the size and shape of the subject <br /> property. <br /> Criterion No. ?.: <br /> That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the property <br /> in the area oP the subject property or to tY.e Cit_y as a whole. <br /> a, rindings:. No adverse comments have been received from the <br /> public at this time. <br /> b. [`nnclncinrlce The variance should not be ;naterially detrimental <br /> to tl:�': pc'operty in the area of the subject property or to the <br /> City as a whole. <br /> Criterion No. 3• <br /> That the variance will only grant the subject property the same <br />