Laserfiche WebLink
ilw.ever, the L'oard mtanbcrs m�de the s�:tc�nent- tl�t the ruling on any City <br />zoniny related itcm prior to the esteiblis}unenE of thc zonir.g ca]e on <br />Deccsnber 1, 1956 ccmes under the 'Grandfather Clause'. 77iis paroel of <br />la�d, being platted and recorded in 19�}3 Lalls under that clause. If it <br />were not for this, the applicant's rnquest wvuld not qualify. <br />A hearinq was heic: on the applicati_�n of Pielun & 9nith rnn�trnction Cn. , <br />P.O. Box 592, Iake Ste��ens, [�II+ 98258 ior a variance fran Ordinance 517-78, <br />Section 200 of the Siiort nlat Ordinance to provide for a twenty (20) foot <br />easanent to serve Int 2 oi a proposed tc.� (2) lot short plat. <br />Ti�al Uescriptio:,: 47ut protion of the S� of the NI•7 'a of the SB ; of <br />Section 36, 4bc•mship 29 North, Ft�inge 4 East, rr.rz. ana <br />of Ints 5& 6, Younce Pclditi ;n. <br />Arldress: Approx. 4918 Elm Street <br />Zoning: R-1 Single Pamily 7Aca Density RPsidential <br />D7r. Nlelinn represented the wnstruction oo�xny and made the following <br />statements : <br />1. 4f�e pml�.oseci single family residence would be a tcao-story structure. <br />2. 4he ne,a buildin9 �,ould add to and upgrade the area. <br />3. The proposcd house on Iot 1 will fr.ont on E1m Street. <br />Several of the neighbors, their names and addresses are on file with the <br />�ilding De�rtmA�t, were against the granting of the variance and sane <br />of their reasons were as folla.as: <br />1. 7hese are �des established by the City and they should l�e adhered <br />to. <br />2. 2here is no hardship shavn and one house rather than tk� should be <br />sufficient. <br />3. 7Yiere �.nuld b� a problc3n £or fire vehicles to qet to the rear lot, <br />the length being 120 ieet. <br />4. �here caould be a sec,er, drainage, and traffic problem. <br />5. 77ie privacy of sane of the neighbors c.ould be :jeo�rdized. <br />6. Zhis is the second ti�m this item has been brwqht beforn the <br />Hoazd. �e first time the request was denied. <br />After vi.suslly viewing the suk+ject property and considering all the facts <br />and �;estim�.-�y it :•:�e m�,��d by Air. I3�rg, seconded bP ubr. ILristianscn and <br />tmanir,nuslv c��,rried to d�nv tile aoolicant's re<tuest as t`lcre is no evidence <br />of a hardsluo. <br />Cki iroi:ion the �t?ng adjourned at 9:10 p.m. <br />��� �� �°��« <br />I�nr,ern G,lla,,an, recret_�-y <br />Bazrd of Pdjusti�t <br />