Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT TO BOARD OF ADJU:+TMENT <br />vAR�ANCE U32-84 <br />Date: October 25, 1984 <br />Applicant: <br />Location of Properl:y: <br />i, RequesCed Action: <br />, <br />I Existing Zoning: <br />Existing Land Use: <br />' Adjacent Land Use/'Loning: <br />� �I <br />�I <br />il Exhibits: <br />�'' 1. Staff Report <br />' 2. Vicinity Map <br />3. Plat Plan <br />��� 4. Narrative Statement <br />�I FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br />Dennis Konopinski <br />18th Avenue Sdest <br />Everett, WA <br />18th Avenue West <br />A variance to allow an easement accessli <br />drive of 7.0' to proposed lot 1. <br />R-2, Single Family High Density�', <br />Residential I <br />Single Family Residential <br />North: Single Pamily/R-2 <br />South: Single Family/R-2 <br />East: Single Family/R-2 <br />West: Single Family/R-2 <br />i, <br />i <br />�! 1. There are exceptional or extraordin3ry circumstances or conditions <br />applying to the subject property whic'.i do not apply generally [o other'i <br />properties in the same vicinity or zone. <br />a. The applican.t owns a parcel 01 property which is located at 9307 <br />- 18th West. The applicant's property consists of a lot with 50" <br />of frontage, 636' of lot depth and 124' of lot width. There is ali <br />t 1. The a licant is ro osin a: <br />e on lo fl <br />sin le family re�idenc pp P P B <br />B <br />two (2) lot short plat. � <br />, b. The applicant`s property has adequate area for. approximately four, <br />to five lots. I <br />2. The authorization of the variance will irot be detrimental to the publicl, <br />welfare or injurious to the property in the same vicinity or zone. <br />a. The applicant is proposing one access poirt onto ISth Avenuel. <br />West. This access point is of aufficient size for future�. <br />development. ', <br />, 3. <br />b. Redevelopment af thls is possible with the lot conFiguration as <br />proposed. <br />There are no reasonable alternatives which woul.d allow for acceptable' <br />design of the short subdivision in accordance with existing standards. <br />a. Finding: Existing City standard would require a 40' <br />riUht••of-way and 24' of pavement. <br />b. Conclusion: Easement access is a reasonable alternative to <br />street at this time. <br />0465F <br />-1- <br />