Laserfiche WebLink
CMI Homebuilder's Inc. WeIIaM Delineation and <br />Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra), Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), <br />spirea (Soiraea douglasii), sk�mk cabbage (Lysichitum amencanum), lady fern (Athyrium filix- <br />femina), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens). The plant cornmunity within the on-site <br />buffer of Wetland A consists largely of a deciduous forest dominated by red alder, salmo�iberry, <br />red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), sword fem (Polystichum munitum), and trailing <br />blackberry (Rubus ursinu.$). Vegetation adjacent to the disturbed northern portion of the <br />wetland consists primarily of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolo� and a row of young <br />Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) along the ditch bank. <br />At the time of the December 1997 field investigation, soils witY; n the wetland generally consisted <br />of a muck that was saturated to the surface, with several inches of ponding observed in places. <br />Wetiand A is a Category II wetland according to Section 37.090 of the City oi EveretYs Sensitive <br />Areas Ordinance. Category II wetlands generally require a 75-foot buffer. <br />5.0 WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES <br />Wetlai ids, in general, provide many valuable ecological and social functions, including <br />storm�.tiater storage, water quality protection, groundwater recharge and discharge, and wildlife <br />habitat. A functional value assessment was con�ucttd for Wetland A to gain a general <br />understanding of the presence and relative importance of specific wetland functions for this <br />wetland. The functional value assessment was based on the methodology presented in the <br />Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Methodology, D,aft Users <br />Manual, May 1997. This mettiooelogy, which was prepared by Szrah Spear Cooke of Cooke <br />Scientific Services, assigns numerical values to the physical, biological, and human use <br />characteristics of wetlands, and empioys best professional judgment. It should be noted that <br />this assessment is meant to be used as a general guideline, and is not intended to be used to <br />assign an absolute value to the function within a given wetland area. <br />Appendiz B contains functional assessment data sheets for Wetland A. A summary of the <br />relative value of the specific functions for this wetland is presented in i'able 1. It appears inat <br />Wetland A functions primarily as wildlife habitat and as a stormwater storage area. The wetland <br />also serves to maintain water quafity in the project area, and may provide some baseflow <br />support to downstream areas. <br />TABLE 1: Wetland A Functional Value <br />Function <br />11Q <br />11� <br />N/A' <br />� <br />11 (max 21 <br /><0 May 2003 <br />364C-IAitR pt4(20May03).doc <br />Consultants, LLC <br />Page3 <br />'%3d <br />