Laserfiche WebLink
�., <br /> ' PL�4NN/NG ANO AIJan Giffen <br /> CO/l�l/I�IL/N/TY OEL/ELOP/l�'ENT Drrecfor <br /> Apri17, 2015 <br /> Mr.Nick Abdelnour <br /> Polygon Northwest <br /> nick.abdelnourr?PolygonHomes.com <br /> RE: Revised landscape plan with retauling wall for Silver Lake townhouse development <br /> Dear Nick: <br /> As we have discussed,Polygon proposes to revise the landscape plan for the portion of the site <br /> located along the southeast frontage of the�roperty along 19T�'Avenue SE. The retaining walls <br /> are proposed between buildings l, 3 and 5 to create a terraced transition between the grade of the <br /> public sidewalk and the private walkways at the first floor level of each buildinb. <br /> From the drawings you have provided, it appears that this grade differential ran�es from <br /> approximately 5 feet at tlie fi•ontage of building 5 up to 8 feet at the frontage of building 1. Your <br /> drawuigs indicate that this grade differential will be terraced with t�vo retainii�.g walls, each not <br /> inore than foiu feet above grade. There will be street h•ees and landscaping between the public <br /> sidewalk and first retaining wall, landscaping between the lower and upper retaining wall, a low <br /> fence atop the upper retaining wall, landscapulg and walkway between the fence and Uuildings. <br /> The graphics you have provided show a"Cornerstone 200"masonry block material for the <br /> retaining wall structures. <br /> Based on all the materials you have subinitted in support of the requested revision to the <br /> landscape plan, I approve this revision and find it to be consistent with the quality represented to <br /> the Planning Conimission and City Council during the planning and permitting processes, even <br /> though it changes the initial graphic which showed individual walkways leading firom the public <br /> sidewalk to each dwelling unit. The remaining buildings that fiont on public streets will keep the <br /> original direct walkway design represented during the public review process. <br /> My one concein is about the viability of the street trees along the frontage between the public <br /> sidewalk and the lower retaining wall. If utilities or other ini-i•astructure improvements are <br /> located in the planting area, any fiirther modification of the landscaping plan must keep the street <br /> trees as an important eleinent of the streetscape design required by tlle City's landscaping <br /> standards. <br /> CITY OF EVERETT • 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Suite 8-A• Everett, WA 98201 • (425) 257-8731 • Fax(425) 257-8742 <br />