My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 100TH ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
100TH ST SE
>
2001
>
2001 100TH ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2017 8:07:52 AM
Creation date
4/14/2017 8:07:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
100TH ST SE
Street Number
2001
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> / <br /> ( � <br /> :a�t.;� -. <br /> .r._I=� . . J <br /> BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> FIr:DINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER <br /> VARIANCE #12-98 <br /> Based upon the writtcn request for a variance from thc City's Zoning Code by: <br /> Applicont: Eurl & Susie Goshorn <br /> 3519 104th Pl. SE <br /> Everett, WA 98208 <br /> hereinaRer rcferred to as "Applica��t," for a variance from lhe special regulations <br /> section of the usc standurds table of the B-2 zone of the City's Zoning Code which <br /> requires thc vehicle holdiag lane to be located a minimum of 100 feet and the <br /> drive-up window n minimum of 50 fcet from residentially zoned properties for <br /> drive-up restAurants. The applicant is proposing a drive-up espresso stand wliich <br /> would have n setback of only 10 feet Cor the vehicle holding lane and a setback of <br /> 40 fect for the drive-up window from a residential zone. <br /> Location: 2001 IOOth Street SE <br /> 7,oning: B-2, Community Business <br /> Land Use: Vucant <br /> Adjncent Lond Use/Zoning: Nortli: Detention Pond/R-2PRD <br /> South: (OOth Street SE/B-1 <br /> Gast: Native Growth Area/R-2PRD <br /> West: Arco Mini Mart/B-2 <br /> Exhibits: <br /> l. Vicinity Mnp <br /> 2. Sitc Plan <br /> 3. Narrative Statement <br /> E►]VDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> Crlterion No. 1� <br /> That the variance is necessary because of exceptional or extraordinary <br /> circumstances regarding the size, shape, topography, or location of the subjecl <br /> property; or the location of a pre-existmg improvement on the suUject propeny <br /> that confomied to the zoning cude in eCfect whtn the improvement wns <br /> constnictcd. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.