Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> I <br /> �, ;,, , � <br /> � '° , <br /> � � � �. <br /> � y HEA��/NG EXA/f'1�/VEIc , <br /> � � <br /> o � � -- <br /> b M b <br /> y 1+ <br /> � a IO M <br /> �p f1 i <br /> M tq <br /> � y IN 'INE h1ATPII2 OF TfiF. Ai'PLICI+TION OF <br /> IKI'p,;RpL — 786 !1ANAGEt�NT� ItY�• [hH <br /> u�i ppPROVAL OF A SIJBDN7SION (EISEC7HOt'11�f� S���ivision �1-91 <br /> � � � �;��r) <br /> � � aRp� p(� (3,ARIFICATIO�J <br /> N <br /> On December 9, 1991, rhe Hearing Examiner oE rhe City of Evecet' grantc� <br /> approval of the above [efecred to preliminary plat, Included ir rhe appcoval <br /> was the Eollowing condition: <br /> 32. Allov+ the construction oE an acoessory building to he <br /> 1.440 sqaare fee� instead oE the code eequlcenent of <br /> 1,000 sq�are feet on lot il. <br /> Also, in the decision was a sa:tion of cormienhs try �e Hearing F.x�rniner. The <br /> camnents included these statem�nts: <br /> It is noted tliat the Applicant also eequested a va[iance <br /> j�� to allow an accessory b�ilding Go exoeed the rtaximum <br /> sqiace Eoo::a9e•estrnwill ibei ddcessed bunde�i aa asepara� <br /> tl. Tfiis requ <br /> ` decision. <br /> ' '� <br /> ��� Obviously, condition t32 and hhe corton�rs �'Ontradict ea� othec. In light o[ <br /> the Eact tliat Ghe oorditions are a part of the oEficial decision while the <br /> �umnenas are the ger�era] impressions of the Hearing Examiner, the conditions <br /> supecsede any carments, <br /> ' '� <br /> Accordingly, condition A32 rertains as stated. a�et��E�rom theedecis9on.� C e <br /> need Eor a variance at a future date are hereby <br /> ��� � Done and dated this 14th day of April, 1992. <br /> . <br /> � � (—' �a-rn� �l. �.,t�c,�� <br /> James M. Dr sco <br /> Hearing Examiner <br /> I �� � <br /> t <br /> Location 3rd Ploor. 2731 'N��tmare 4vr�nue • Eveiet�. W�`��`�� <br /> CITY HALI. • 700� WF'Imore �ve • Evere�t NA 98201 • i2(1G1 259�k1;'2 • Fn� 1.061 25`e �3�a'� <br />