Laserfiche WebLink
UPS <br />November 12, 1978 <br />Page Two <br />material was removed from the site. In the deepest area to be backfilled <br />several minor seepages were exposed during the excavation of unsuitable <br />soils. These we, a first covered with 4" - 6" (size) cobbles and then <br />received a lift o, imported clean sand. Native materials used for backfill <br />Included: Brown, gravelly silt and sand (A); and gray, silty gravel and <br />sand (B). For use in the more moist, low areas of the site, gray line sand <br />(C) was imported and placed before further backfilling proceeded. With the <br />arrival of wet weather, the contractor opted to fill the area directly under <br />the building site with imported clean sand (E) to bring that portion of the <br />site up to grade. After a site visit by Tom Bekey, Chief Geologist, the <br />storm sewer contractor began using an impoi ted silty, gravelly sand (D) <br />and clean sand (E) for trench backfill to achieve required compaction. <br />The maximum dry densities (ASTM:D-1557-70T) of the respective <br />materials were: <br />(A) 110 PCF @ 11% optimum moisture <br />(B) 126 PCF @ 10 % optimum moisture <br />(C) 110 PCF @ 10% optimum moisture <br />(D) 132.5 PCF @ 8% optimum moisture <br />(E) 120.5 PCF @ 13% optimum moisture <br />Specifications required that the fill material be compacted to at least <br />95% of ASTM:D-1557 (AASHO:T-180). On November 4 however, the <br />requirement was lowered to 92%. The in -place density test locations may <br />be seen on the Site Plan, Plate 1. The following are the test results: <br />