2601 101ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

IN THE , •• iI ��' �' � � MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF Jq � ' CHARLES BRIGHT FOR APpROVAL OF A N��'' �� VARIANCE (��HOWER CO � �RT Cl lq y� e � j�, _. .... , ��,,,� �, ,°� C�ERETr "VARIANCE #1_gq nDne� orks U,�p� PUfSU8f1� f0 �hE! 8UiF1pry'f ��4 93 (an ordinance a,nending the City's Land Use Hearing Examiner Ordinance Y 8��en the Hearing Examiner in Section 1y.q.4 of Ordinance �g69_ 2.23• �2�)), the City of Everett hereb Eisenhower Court Subdivision located e� nts a minor modification of lot #12 a{ theMC The minor modification allowed is that a residenc:e on lot *12 can be �1 - 101st Street u.E., Everett, Weshington. five foot setback, but it must be i;onstructed co�gistent with the desiq� as set �orth on exhibit �M4 of this request. This Order is su �nstructed within the conclusions: Pported by the following findings and FIMDINGe r+e fAG*' �• The Hearing Examiner granted prelimina Subdiviaion on Decembar 9, 1991, q�i�e1 plepa Vel of the Eiaenh April 14, 1993. PProval was made by t e City on �• A buildin0 Permit for lot #12 was iss�e� by the City on November 10, 1gg�, the time of ccnetructfon, the City inspecfed the ro partially construc�� reS1dence on lot #12 was not within the approved buildi eusite of the final plat. The reaidence ranged from 4.8 feet�ta q 2 fee� f� mlthe $ide the property line insfead of a�ihering to the required five foot setbadc. 3• Subsequent to the City's Ins an application to the City tor the minor modificatiun of the setback ae set forth in Pe ion, the owner of lot *12, Charles Bright, submitted Ordinance 196g.93 Secdon 12,q 7'he �ih, planning Department reviewed the application and aubmltted a staff report to the Hearing Examiner on January 1q, � 994• T'he City recAmmended approval of the minor modification in order to allow the encroechment within the east aetback of the subject prop� 4• The modificatian a � adjoinin p�e� �0 �°f � S�9nificant impact to the sub'ect ro remedie8d by thertm �ortmodificallon of the e�bacl�$ as ahet forth in Ord na �rtY or to P Pe►t owner and can be 93 Section 12.A. 1969- �• Purauant to Ordinance 196g_g3 Sectio�, the He jurisdiction to issue a minor modification. aring Examiner has 2• The minor modification requested by the property owner is lnsignificant and does not impact other properties.