Laserfiche WebLink
b. Concluaion: �ie eigning that [he applican[ la reques[ing, Ls <br />avallable to the majori[y of property owners in [he area. <br />3. that [he authoriza[Son of euc1� variance vill not be meterially <br />detrimental [o [he public velfare or injurinus [o property in Che <br />viclni[y or zanc in which the proper[y ie located. � <br />a. Finding: There are already, a number of signe ln the aree. The <br />proper[y frontage le on 112th S[. S.E. vhich ie a major er[erial <br />and has 11,110 tripe per dey. The aign would be on the property <br />frontage and would not be adjacent to reeiden[Sal usee. � <br />b. Conclueion: The au[horization of applicant'e variance vould not <br />affect the R-3 zuned proper[y ea vell ae o[her property in the , <br />B-1 zone by atloving thie eign. <br />4. Thet the granting of euch variance vill not advereely effect the <br />Comprehenelve Pl.an. <br />a. Finding: The Compreheneive Plan ehove this at the edge of a <br />Co�erlcal Node. The B-1 zone lmplemente [ha[ becauee of the � <br />[ype of uees ellowed in tha[ zone and being edjacent [o <br />residential zoned property. � <br />b. Conclusion: � <br />The granting of the veriance would not be contrary to the � <br />Compreheneive Plan. Thia uee being on edge in a trenei[lon area � <br />ie [o buffer incampatible usee. AllowSng signing in thie area <br />would not affect thoee adjecent residential ueee. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Adjuetment of [he City of Evere[t doee �. <br />hereby urder that the variance request of the Applicant be CRANTED. <br />DATED thie �_ day of , 1984. <br />Chal.rmen, Board of Adjus[men[ <br />EXliIBIT ll2 <br />