My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1600 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
121ST ST SE
>
1600
>
1600 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2017 10:56:45 AM
Creation date
4/14/2017 10:16:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
121ST ST SE
Street Number
1600
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1894
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT2 <br />CASPER CREEK MDNS (SEPA #92-89) <br />MONITORING ELEMENT OF THE WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN <br />The following provides a suggested framework for monitonng of the Casper Creek <br />wetlands. <br />A cort�monly overlooked component of a restoration project is monitonng, which <br />provides invaluable feedback on: <br />1) Compliance of the restoration plan with the stated restoration goals; <br />2) Creation of habitet values that are equivalent to those lost dunng <br />construction or those that wete once present in the Palustrine, scrub/shrub <br />wetlands; <br />3) Major problems in the restoration program that can be corrected with revised <br />planting, and watering or buHering measures; and <br />4) Ways in which the restoration design and techniques can be modified to <br />improve success. This type of infortnation will aid in the planning and design <br />of other restoration efforts. <br />Without data on the four areas listed above, there is no way to evaluate the success of <br />the restoration within the Casper Creek PalusUine scrub/shrub wetlands. To detertnine <br />if compliance has occuRed with the stated goals oi the restoration, it is necessary to <br />develop a hypothesis and peAortnance cnteria. The hypothesis establishes a series cf <br />well defined statements, based on the observation of other Palustnne suublshrub <br />wetland ecosystems in the area, that assert what rype of environmental conditions will <br />occur in the restoration area within a ceRain period of time. To provide "proof' that <br />these environmental wnditions have been achieved, suentlf : measurement of various <br />parameters for specific cntical components oi the Palustnne scrub/shrub habitat <br />ecosystem must be made over time. These components inGude, but are not limited to, <br />the flora, fauna, water quality, and soil chemistry. PeAortnance cnteria set <br />measurement levels for each component, based on observation of other similar <br />relatively pristine PalusUine scrub/shrub wetland ecosystems, at which the statements <br />within the hypothesis would be "proven." <br />Hypofheala <br />Hypothesis: Degraded wetland areas within the Casper C�eek property (Sihrer Lake <br />watershed) can be rostored to: (1) exhibit physical a:�d biological attributes that occur <br />within the natural vanability ol monitored relativ�ly pristine Pa/ustrine scrub/shrub <br />weHand ecosystems wNhin fhe Si/ver Lake watershed and the adjoining watersheds; (2) <br />provide obsenred lundiona/ values (e.g. food chain support) o/ these natural habifats; <br />and (3) resuM in a seH-sustaining ecosystem, at the end ol a 5 year monitoring period, <br />taking into consideration any ecosystem decline that has been o6senred within <br />monRored natu�a/ habitats. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.