My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1329 63RD ST SE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
63RD ST SE
>
1329
>
1329 63RD ST SE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2021 7:53:29 AM
Creation date
4/17/2017 9:33:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
63RD ST SE
Street Number
1329
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C lfq CCahC,1 M(4 aL?-> <br />the fence lowered to code requirements. <br />Tim Vardy countered stating that the fence is only 5' in the <br />rear measurinc rom their side of the fence and not including <br />the poles. He stated that he removed some lilacs from the side <br />neighboring the Osborn's property which has allowed the tenants <br />to look outside the windows. <br />Mr. Osborn, of 2511 Grand, stated that the fence is 64" high <br />since it is 4" above the concrete sidewalk and is 5' in height. <br />Fence is 3' from the four windows of his hoi,se. <br />Linda McKay, of 2931 Nassau and in support o'. the variance, <br />said that she did not realize the fence company would cut the <br />Osborn's trees but she felt that the fence is needed for the <br />children's safety. They have had a survey done on their <br />property. <br />Doug Lever, of 2925 Nassau and neighbor across the street, <br />supported the variance stating that the cyclone fence does not <br />obstruct any views and that a higher fence was needed to <br />prevent children from climbing over the fence. Rohert Drake <br />supported the variance stating that there has been a problem <br />with thefts. <br />Mr. Osborn only asks that the fence conform with what the code <br />allows, not that there be no fence at all. He had also <br />informed the fence company what the allowec'. height of a fence <br />was. <br />MOTION: C.J. Ebert moved to approve the variance allowing a <br />601' high fence except next to the rental on the Osborn's <br />property where it must be lowered to be 1" below the lowest <br />window sill. Mrs. Duchea seconded the motion. <br />VOTE: All in favor. <br />ITEM 6 <br />Applicant: Jeffrey Gehrig C��G� _p�U <br />1329 63rd St. <br />Everett, WA <br />Variance Requested: To allow the construction of a 1700 <br />square foot garage and shop which <br />would exceed the 1000 square foot <br />maximum lot coverage and the maximum <br />50% coverage in the rear yard for an <br />accessory structure allowed by code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.