My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1320 75TH ST SW BASE FILE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
75TH ST SW
>
1320
>
BASE FILE
>
1320 75TH ST SW BASE FILE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2017 9:35:23 AM
Creation date
4/18/2017 12:39:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
75TH ST SW
Street Number
1320
Tenant Name
BASE FILE
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
��C�[��d�� <br />C� [� <br />JUN R � <br />...........__ <br />CITY Of EVERETT <br />� yr Wqr46 '7.x� <br />Hortorr Dennis f� �Fsociat¢s, Inc <br />� <br />Con.cu�ting Fnqineers <br />Mr. Oan Olson <br />THE KOLL COMPANY <br />2021 - 152nd Avenue N.E. <br />Redmond, Washington 98052 <br />May 27, 1982 <br />SUBJECT: 0'DONNELL BRIGHAM & PARTNERS/N.W. <br />PAINE FIELD INDUSTRIAL CE��fER <br />Dear Dan: <br />;, <br />. ,, ��� <br />, .. V� <br />.: ,4� <br />l <br />+n_ <br />1 �:1" <br />I� '' <br />i�t�E� :�T�r•• /� <br />MAY 2 8 1982 <br />THE N.O!! Cr, <br />Reference is made to my letter of May 19, 1982, The reason for <br />deleting the two (2) catch basins, are as follows: <br />Building 8- the Type IV CB/solid lid was intended to serve as a <br />junction box ta allow the outfall pipe fran the storm system tc be laid <br />with a minimum of rtructural excavation in the fill prism; the deletion <br />of the structure will not affect the operation of LhP system. <br />Building 12 - the 7ype IV inlet was designed to intercept the run- <br />off from the access road and tightline it to a nearby existing catch <br />basin in 75th Street. However, a plethora of underground utilities will <br />make this installation difficult. Since there is an existing catch basin <br />within ap�,�ximately twenty feet of the inlet location and since storm <br />runoff wi11 flow through the driveway approach to the existing gutter and <br />to the existing catch basin; deletion of the Type IV inlet should produce <br />no drainage problems. <br />Nere the existing Ca not so close to the point of discharge and <br />were there not utilities in place to cbnflict with construction, we <br />would recommend installation of the inlet. Nowever, these two condi- <br />tions promote our recomnendation that the inlet may be deleted. <br />If you have any questions, please call us. <br />b1�3�� Sist1� :1 t�.. Soutlt, ti, ,' 4 <br /><<�lt%..��'��s%�ina(ort U�'�1(�� <br />TNC. <br />Pl,,,,,,� 7n7_.3.L�n <br />� <br />1 <br />� <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.