Laserfiche WebLink
�����d[�� <br />JUN R � <br />CITY OF EVERET� <br />a..tir 'HrY�' '�"�'A <br />Hnrlon Dcnnis G�',�asociates, Inc. <br />� <br />i.'nnsu�ling Frryineera <br />Mr. Dan Olson <br />THE KOLL COMPANY <br />2�21 - 152nd Avenue N.E. <br />Redmond, Washington 98052 <br />May 27, 1982 <br />SUBJECT: 0'DONNELL BRIGHAM 8 PARTNERS/N.W. <br />PAINE FIELD INDUSTRIAL CENTER <br />Dear Dan: <br />MAY 2 8 1982 <br />THE N.O;: CC, <br />Referrnce is made to my letter of May 1g, 19g2, Tfie rea•,on for <br />deleting the tdo (2) catch basins, are as followc: <br />Building 8- the Type IV CB/solid lid was intended to serve as a <br />junction box to allow the outfall pipe from the storm system to be laid <br />with a minimum of structural excavation in the fill prisrn; the deletion <br />of the structure will not affect the operation of the system. <br />Building 12 - the Type IV inlet was designed to intercept the run- <br />off from the access road and tightline it to a nearby existing catch <br />basin in 75th Street. However, a plethora of underground utilities witl <br />make this installation difficult. Since there is an existing catch basin <br />within approximately twenty feet of the inlet location and since storm <br />runoff will flow thr�ugh the driveway approach to the existing gutter and <br />to the existing catch basin; deletion of the Type IV inlet should produce <br />no drainage problems. <br />Were the existing CB not so close to the poin: of disr.harge and <br />were there not utilities in place to cbnflict with construction, we <br />would recommend installation uf the inlet. However, these two condi- <br />tions promote our recomnendation tha+. the inlet may be deleted. <br />If you have any questions, please call us. <br />W�s: t�t <br />vl���� SlXIIT rif��'. ��JUIl7, <br />INC. <br />�ti��alf%, �"as%iin��fo�r (7�4]L�t3 • �lrrni�� %Oi-.4�,�h <br />:G i <br />1 <br />� <br />_J <br />