Laserfiche WebLink
December 5,1995 <br />Mechanical Plans Examiner <br />Everett, Washington <br />Re: Sofiwodd Services Facility <br />Dear Sir or Madam: <br />In reference to the the 1994 Washington Slate Energy Code regarding economizer requirements <br />McKinstry is requesting a waiver from this requirement based on section 1433, Item 1 b. The <br />facility consists of several large equipment rooms (clean room: class 100,000) and so ne small <br />office/support area. This equipment must be maintained at 72 F and 50% relative humidity for <br />proper operation and equipment longevity. <br />For this mason, McKinstry performed an energy usage analysis to determine the feasability of <br />utilizing air-s!de economizers and the associated humidification regvirement versus utilizing <br />refdgrration oily with minimum outside air. The attached calculation Indicates that the annual <br />humidification load required for the conditioning of the necessary outside air exceeds the annual <br />cooling load of the space utilizing refrigeration only. <br />The calculation Is broken down into several columns: outside air temperature bins, mean <br />coincident wit bulb temperatures, it hourly observations per bin, grains of moisture at the bin <br />dry and wet tulb conditions, outside air per bin required for cooling, process cooling load (mbh), <br />transmission cooling load (mbh), economizer cooling available (mbh),annual chiller energy <br />required (mbh), and annual humidification energy required (mbh). With the EER of the <br />refrigeration equipment taken as 10.7, the total kw-hr required annually for the system with <br />economizer is 1,303,406 kw-hr versus 1020,144 kw-hr for the system without economizer. <br />If you have any questions or wish to discuss [his proposal in further detail, please give me. a call <br />at 762.3311, X-164. <br />Sincerely, <br />Ching Wong <br />Senior Engineer <br />cc: Doug Moore <br />Michael Wright <br />Dan Robinson <br />