My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3890
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 3890
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2017 9:26:44 AM
Creation date
4/18/2017 9:26:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
3890
Date
1/26/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
" . . . does not provide a transition in scale and <br /> use between the residential and commercial areas. <br /> EMC 19.21.010 (page 21.04) , which established the <br /> 100 foot setback from residential zones that <br /> adjoin C-1R properties with dancing or live <br /> entertainment, clearly was a standard that was <br /> enacted to provide 'a transition in scale and use' <br /> between these conflicting areas." <br /> The Examiner concluded that, because the proposal does not <br /> meet the 100 foot setback standard, it would not be <br /> adequately screened or buffered from the single-family zone <br /> to the south. The Examiner also concluded that exterior <br /> noise would be generated by ancillary activities on the <br /> site, including parking, loading, and increased people. <br /> The purpose of the 100 foot setback is to reduce noise <br /> impacts associated with live music and dancing. During the <br /> process of revising the Zoning Code in 1988-89, the Planning <br /> Department received public input and complaints about loud <br /> music from existing businesses adjoining residential <br /> property. The standard was not intended to apply to <br /> accessory uses and activities, and did not originate as a <br /> result of noise from these activities. <br /> There are other standards in the Zoning Code that are <br /> intended to provide a transition in scale and use. These <br /> include the Type I landscaping standard, and the requirement <br /> for a six foot solid fence. There is an additional <br /> limitation on building height for structures located near <br /> residential zones. The proposal complies with all of these <br /> standards. These regulations were intended to implement the <br /> policies of the Everett General Plan. <br /> Conclusions: The principle issue of land use compatibility <br /> that must be addressed is the noise resulting from live <br /> music at the restaurant. Based on detailed noise studies <br /> provided by an acoustical engineer, City staff and the <br /> Hearing Examiner have concluded that exterior noise levels <br /> would be reduced to below the threshold of the Noise <br /> Ordinance, if the addition is constructed in accordance with <br /> the recommendations of the amended acoustical study. The <br /> above findings concerning applicability of the 100 foot <br /> setback standard mean that substantial weight should be <br /> given to the issue of exterior noise resulting from live <br /> music at the restaurant. This assumes the soundstage would <br /> be relocated to the new addition. <br /> No evidence has been submitted to demonstrate that exterior <br /> noise and other impacts resulting from ancillary site <br /> activities would be greater from Gerry Andal's than for <br /> other uses permitted outright in the zone. With the <br /> attached conditions, the Andal's use would comply with all <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.