Laserfiche WebLink
CG -1 I ( -Do`1 <br /> FIELD REPORT <br /> U <br /> Project: 117- 79'h Place Addition File No.: 440010_ <br /> Cornerstone ')UBLI(('' �(//� <br /> ® Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: Cascade Testing Date: 20T0.W9RKS <br /> A Division of Robinson&Noble,Ina <br /> 17625130^Avenue NE C102 Location: Everett Report No: 2 <br /> Woodinville,WA 98072 Weather: Sunny--70 deg. Page: I of 2 <br /> Purpose of Addition Footing Subgradc <br /> Phone: 425-844-1977 Visit: Evaluaftri <br /> Fax: 425.844-1987 3y: KWB <br /> We were onsite at the request of Pat, with American Home Builders, for the purpose of evaluating <br /> foundation subgrade for the residential addition located at 117—791h Place SE in Everett. We have <br /> previously evaluated the foundation subgrade in the back yard. Some loose fill soil was encountered <br /> and documented in Field Report I. We were onsite today to observe the removal of the loose fill and <br /> provide recommendations for backfill. <br /> We observed the contractor remove the undocumented fill to expose a thin layer of native organic <br /> topsoil than was roughly 3 to 9 inches thick. The fill consisted of gray to dark brown silty sand with <br /> gravel and trace garbage, angular rock spalls and organics. We estimate that the fiil was ''/n to 3 feet <br /> duck. We observed the contractor remove the loose native soils exposing medium dense netive rust <br /> mottled brown silty sand with gravel and silt with sand and gravel. Using repeated effort,we probed <br /> through the 8 to 12 inches of medium dense soil and consistently encountered very dense gray glacial till <br /> that we could not penetrate with our probe rod. We observed the contractor use a jumping jack to <br /> compact the thin zone of native soil overlying the till. The compacted subgrade was probed 1 to 4 <br /> inches prior to the backfill being placed. The trencli was about 3 feet wide at the base,4 feet wide at the <br /> top and varied in depth of roughly 1 %to 4'/2 feet deep. The approximate depths of overexcavation are <br /> shown on page two. We informed the contractor that the onsite 1 '/. inch crushed rock would make <br /> suitable backfill if adequately compacted in lifts less than n foot in thickness. We departed the site <br /> because the spoils needed to be loaded in a truck and hauled away and it would be a couple hours before <br /> work on the footing subgrade overexcavation would resume. We were requested to return in about <br /> three hours. <br /> We returned approximately three hours later and observed the contractor placing and compacting 8 inch <br /> Hill of crushed rock within the trench area shown. Some of the trench had been backfilled up to the final <br /> elevation. The crushed rock appeared dense and we probed less than 3 inches into it. It is our opinion <br /> that the overcxcavation and backfill process we observed should provide the specified 2,000 psf bearing <br /> pressure as shown on the onsite plans. <br /> The contractor informed us that the backfill proc.•s was taking longer than expected and that no more <br /> footing subgradc would be excavated. We were requested to be onsite Monday at 10:30 em. <br /> Attachment Signed: <br /> Distribution: <br />