Laserfiche WebLink
I.IAY R I9 �. <br />CIn O . • , . ,. �t. <br />May 8, 1980 <br />everett <br />crtv u�u <br />[vcne,r. w.unne,on <br />John E. Phillips <br />City Anemq <br />Attorney at Law <br />403 Columbia 9t ee <br />Seattle, WA <br />Re: Sewer Connection Charge Applica04 bility and Hold Harmless Language <br />Dear John: <br />This letter will confirm lily ourphone <br />the ordinance I establishing special ns. The first echarges foou r <br />hFd <br />concerned the applicability <br />connection to the Citye mils system ior toOtheneff ctive6date0of the ordinance.er hoAs I <br />applied for building p P pure vested rights case <br />Indicated, 1 am not convinced that this situation is a <br />because I don't feel the vested rights doctrine <br />es all additional tdo conditions <br />or <br />regulations on the issuance of a building permit. <br />intent o[ the City Council under Ordinance No. 669-80 was to exclude from and <br />coverage of the ordinance those developers <br />whoprior hto the ad left effective tted an pdate-catoi the <br />were actively pursuing building permits <br />ord <br />sewiernassessmentdsuchltasta mitigatingsofar as conditi condition iaadeclarationbasis <br />of non <br />significance or resulting from a formal environmental assessment such as an impact <br />statement. Also, 1 would further qualify this position concerning building permit <br />ss of 190 days. (See Uniform Building Code, <br />applications which are pending in exce <br />Section 303(c).) <br />The second concern you raised in our discussions was the breadth the hold <br />harmless est ge in the follow v lopmene <br />ould suggest agreement. In order to address this concern, <br />8. Developer covenants <br />co td a pense� claim, cause of save and hold yharmless <br />rees f action or <br />from any and <br />damage incurred by, suffered or occasioned to developer, is <br />successors in interest, tenang from, <br />nts, or lessees procedesulture agreed <br />arising out of or proximately caused by P <br />to herein including but not li eifl' rt° delay expenses, <br />by <br />causes of action or damag <br />additional environmental review °urs ant to this nAgreement <br />procedures followed . the City p <br />and/or the final ordinance whic�hbl'C�elmP�ovementsl in oche <br />concerning development and p <br />vicinity of Casino Road. <br />