My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 3:55:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2017 11:06:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
5/26/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Staff Report on Industrial Land policy for Southwest Everett <br />Background <br />a <br />While the recent request from CEMEX is the best known effort to. convert industrial <br />lands to other uses such as residential and mixed use, there have been several. similar <br />attempts over the past few years. To date'staff as.relied on adopted policies found in the <br />Comprehensive Plan to inform prospective parties interested in converting industrial <br />zoned land to other uses that the City policy is to preserve these lands for future job <br />growth, and protect compatibility among existing uses in the affected area. <br />The history of those the industrial land policies came in to being follows: <br />Historical'Precedent <br />The 1994 update to the City Comprehensive Plan was the first update guided by the State <br />Growth Management Act (GMA). Given the scope of changes called for in the GMA, it <br />was decided to have a declaration of significance and accomplish an Environmental <br />Impact Statement (EIS). The EIS -examined future growth scenarios which emphasized <br />employment growth, population growth and a mix of the two. At the time under <br />Alternative 2 of the Draft EIS, the southwest Everett industrial area was designated as a <br />"special study area," and considered for partial conversion to "other uses." <br />Uses which were to be considered in future studies were, "residential, parks, schools, <br />employment activities, retail, office, service and industrial." A result of the EIS process <br />was a request by a major local land owner and the broader business community to retain <br />industrial areas, and not to convert them to other uses. <br />Specifically the Final 1994 EIS included comments on the draft analysis just described <br />from several organizations in response to the idea that some industrial land might be <br />converted to "other use(s)." <br />Three of the 1994 FEIS responses are offered below to give an idea of the proposed City <br />strategy at that time. <br />From Associated Sand and Gravel (now CEMEX's), "Several cities and industrial <br />developers have expressed concern that the usable inventory of land for job - <br />producing industry is in shorter supply than existing land use maps presume to <br />provide. A key goal of the Growth Management Act and of the Snohomish <br />County Economic Investment Strategy has been to accurately inventory usable <br />land areas and set these aside for protection so that family wage jobs can be <br />provided in step with the growth in our area's region." <br />124 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.