My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 3:55:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2017 11:06:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
5/26/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Response to Comments <br />CEMEX Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement <br />November 30, 2009 <br />36. Michael Barthol, AIA <br />Mr. Barthol asks about single family setbacks, parking requirements, construction that is "Built <br />Green certified" and parkland development within the subject site. <br />Response: The intent of the Design Guidelines & Standards at this point is to give a fair and <br />accurate rendition of what such a development could look like. If City decision makers find <br />reason to be supportive of a change in land use policy for this location, then a closer examination <br />of details of the proposed guidelines & standards would take place. At that time a public review <br />would be carried out, before final approval would be granted. Please continue to follow the <br />process and participate in providing input. <br />Mr. Barhol also asks where responses to land use policy recommendations made by the author of <br />the South Everett Industrial Land Analysis might be found. <br />Response: The Analysis contains recommendations which will be used as part of the policy <br />discussion by citizens, Planning Commission, City Council and staff. The City is being asked to <br />review and change its industrial land use polices in order to allow the proposed development to <br />proceed. If there is a desire to make a change in industrial land use policy, we have addressed <br />that issue in this FSEIS, Appendix C. The City offers (draft) suggested changes that would need <br />to be made to existing land use policy if City decision makers wish to change the Comprehensive <br />Plan map and the city industrial policy documents. If the opposite is found to be the case, and <br />City decision makers decide not to approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment based on <br />standing City industrial land policy, then recommendations made by the author of the Industrial <br />Land Analysis would be noted as a basis, in part, for the final decision. <br />At this time the findings and recommendations of the Industrial Land Analysis have been <br />accepted by the City as competent and credible. Please refer also to comment # 15 in Chapter 3 <br />below. <br />37. James Boyce <br />Mr. Boyce speaks against the proposal, noting current "clogged" roads in the area, and the need <br />for more "quality jobs" in Everett. <br />Response: Thank you for your comment. <br />Chapter 1 — General Comments <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.