Laserfiche WebLink
Decision: <br /> Deny the appeal and affirm the Decision Document as written with regard to this issue. <br /> SECTION 42: BOEING $2 MILLION VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION <br /> Findings: <br /> • Appellants' assertion that the $2.0 million voluntary contribution would be better spent <br /> if it were donated to the Housing Trust Fund has not been factually or analytically <br /> supported in the record. <br /> • The Appellants assert that a voluntary contribution of$2.0 million investment tax credits <br /> will provide few housing units. However. Appellants fail to provide any information to <br /> the record to support such an assertion. <br /> • Boeing has agreed to provide $2.0 million worth of investment tax credits in low income <br /> housing as a voluntary mitigation measure. <br /> • The tax credit program is the principal assistance program for participation by the private <br /> sector and is recognized in both State and Federal housing programs. <br /> • A $2.0 million investment in tax credits will allow creation of an estimated 100 units of <br /> low income housing. <br /> • The Responsible Official maintains the responsibility for the implementation of the <br /> Decision Document and the mitigation measures contained therein. The expanded <br /> Mitigation Committee is to advise the Responsible Official as to how the mitigation <br /> measures are carried out. <br /> • The tax credit program has already operated in over 15 projects in Snohomish County <br /> and it has a proven track record for creating low income housing (Housing Finance Committee <br /> Rental Rehabilitation Guide). <br /> • Appellant's assertion that $2.0 million will result in the production of relatively few <br /> housing units is not supported by adequate data or analysis on the record. <br /> Conclusions: <br /> • Where, as here, the $2.0 million contribution is voluntary, it is the decision of the <br /> contributor not the Responsible Official as to what is a "preferable contribution". <br /> 61 <br />