Laserfiche WebLink
ii. Very high/severe erosion hazard areas include slopes of >40% in Qva and Qal <br />geologic units. <br />b. Those areas defined as medium risk of erosion in the Dames and Moore <br />Methodology for the Inventory, Classification and Designation of Geologically <br />Hazardous Areas City of Everett, Washington: July 1, 1991 when they contain debris <br />and mud flows, gullying or rilling, immature vegetation, or no vegetation: <br />i. slopes of 25-40% in other (not Qva or Qal) geologic units <br />4. Other areas which the city has reason to believe are geologically hazardous. <br />B. Protective Requirements. <br />1. Geotechnical assessment requirements. Development proposals on or within 200 feet <br />of any area designated as or which, based on site specific field investigation, the city <br />has reason to believe are geologically hazardous areas shall submit a geological <br />assessment as required by subsection F [37.080(F)]. <br />2. The setback buffer requirement shall be based upon information contained in a <br />geological assessment, and shall be measured on a horizontal plane from a vertical line <br />established at the edge of the geologically hazardous area limits (both from the top and <br />toe of slope). In the event that a specific setback buffer is not included in the <br />recommendation of the geological assessment, the setback buffer shall be based upon <br />the standards contained in Chapter 18 of the International Building Code (IBC), or as <br />the IBC is updated and amended. <br />a. If the geological assessment recommends setback buffers that are less than the <br />standard buffers that would result from application of Chapter 18 of the IBC, the <br />specific rationale and basis for the reduced buffers shall be clearly articulated in the <br />geological assessment. <br />b. The City may require larger setback buffer widths under any of the following <br />circumstances: <br />i. The land is susceptible to severe erosion and erosion control measures will not <br />effectively prevent adverse impacts. <br />ii. The area has a severe risk of slope failure or downslope stormwater drainage <br />impacts. <br />iii. The increased buffer is necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare <br />based upon findings and recommendations of the geological assessment. <br />3. Unless otherwise permitted as part of an approved alteration, the setback buffers <br />required by this subsection shall be maintained in native vegetation to provide <br />additional soil stability and erosion control. If the buffer area has been cleared, it shall <br />be replanted with native vegetation in conjunction with any proposed development <br />activity. <br />4. The City may impose seasonal restrictions on clearing and grading within 200 feet of <br />any Geologically Hazardous Areas. <br />16 <br />