Laserfiche WebLink
wetland delineation and study must be completed by a biologist with expertise in wetlands in <br />compliance with Chapter 37 of the Zoning Code. Wetlands can change over time and EMC. <br />19.37 requires use of the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, <br />rather than the Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi -Quantitative Assessment Methodology <br />used in the EIS. (SEPA Land and Shoreline Use, Water, and Plant and Animal Policies) <br />2. Wetlands must be retained and buffers must be provided per the requirements of Chapter 37, <br />or mitigation must occur. Where the applicant proposes alteration of the wetland or buffer, <br />additional studies must be completed and the alterations must be approved by the Planning <br />Director consistent with the standards in EMC 19.37. (SEPA Plant and Animal, Water, and <br />Land and Shoreline Use Policies) <br />3. When an applicant proposes to fill or alter all or a portion of a wetland, the wetland <br />replacement ratios shall be per the requirements of Chapter 37 of the Zoning Code. <br />Table 4-1 provides a summary of potential wetland mitigations by basin. <br />Note that where mitigation measures include raising the elevation of outlets in flow through <br />riparian systems, the mitigation will be subject to site-specific analysis addressing the <br />feasibility of the mitigation. The mitigation shall not be used for meeting on-site stormwater <br />detention requirements. The intent is to create additional wetlands and increase the range of <br />water depths to approximately .5 to 2 feet so that a mosaic of emergent, scrub shrub and open <br />water habitat would be created. The intent is to significantly improve the habitat functions.2 <br />The detailed wetland mitigation plan/report must demonstrate that wildlife habitat will be <br />significantly improved by the proposed mitigation and that raising the outlet elevation will <br />not result in degradation of the existing wetland. Mitigation must also be designed to ensure <br />that stability of adjacent slopes is not impacted and that the mitigation will not adversely <br />impact adjacent or downstream properties. (SEPA Land and Shoreline Use, Water, and <br />Plant and Animal Policies) <br />2 Restricting the outlet can also significantly improve the water quality improvement functions, while also providing some <br />stormwater detention function. However the mitigation cannot be used to meet required stormwater treatment and detention <br />requirements. <br />10 <br />