Laserfiche WebLink
4.3.4 Mitigating Impacts of Development on Wetlands <br />The wetland mapping completed for the Subarea Plan is not sufficient for purposes of project <br />review (since boundaries were estimated and not delineated). At the time development is <br />proposed on a site containing wetlands, a wetland delineation and study must be completed <br />by a biologist with expertise in wetlands in compliance with Chapter 37 of the Zoning Code. <br />Wetlands can change over time and incomplete wetland assessment data is available on some <br />wetlands. When a project is proposed on a specific site, the wetland assessment(s) for the <br />site must be updated/completed as part of the wetland delineation/study, using the Wetland <br />and Buffer Functions Semi -Quantitative Assessment Methodology. (SEPA Land and <br />Shoreline Use, Water, and Plant and Animal Policies) <br />2. Wetlands must be retained and buffers must be provided per the requirements of Chapter 37, <br />or mitigation must occur. Where the applicant proposes alteration of the wetland or buffer, <br />additional studies must be completed and the alterations must be approved by the Planning <br />Director. The following wetland mitigation strategy will supersede the requirements of the <br />Zoning Code: <br />a. Wetlands that should be preserved and protected include: <br />• Habitat Function Group 1 wetlands larger than 1 acre. <br />• Wetlands located in a riparian corridor or wildlife corridor. <br />• Wetlands that drain into an adjacent Habitat Function Group 1 wetland (such as Narbeck <br />or Kasch Swamps) or regionally rare wetland types such as Kasch Bog. <br />• Wetlands with unique plant or animal species present. <br />• Wetlands located in significant groundwater recharge areas. <br />If fill/alteration of these wetlands is proposed, the mitigation sequencing preference order <br />found in Section 37.110 of the Zoning Code shall be followed. Avoiding impacts is <br />preferred, especially in areas where habitats are rare, sensitive, or critical for key species of <br />wildlife and where wetlands perform functions that are needed or limited in a drainage basin. <br />Avoidance is perhaps most important in bogs and in forested wetlands. Surfacewater storage <br />is a function that is limited in the southern half of the SW Everett Subarea. Preservation of <br />wetlands with good storage capacity (such as Narbeck Swamp) is therefore a priority. <br />Preservation or enhancement of the stormwater control and water quality improvement <br />functions for wetlands is important in the industrial areas where pollution and large amounts <br />of impervious surface are a problem. This is especially true because of normally limited on- <br />site stormwater storage, flood attenuation, and water quality improvement in industrial areas. <br />b. The City shall allow all other wetlands to be altered or filled without following the standard <br />mitigation preference order, provided that compensation/mitigation occurs as approved by <br />the Planning Director. Figure 4-1 (Figure M-1 in the EIS) shows the approximately 8 acres <br />of wetlands that can potentially be filled under this policy, provided that unique plant and <br />animal species are not present on these sites (see Condition 2.a. above). Mitigation shall <br />include protection and maintenance of the flood/storm water control and water quality <br />7 <br />