My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 6527
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 6527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2013 4:26:17 PM
Creation date
9/30/2013 4:26:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
6527
Date
8/8/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VIII. Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> The major findings of each section are summarized below. <br /> SUMMARY <br /> OVERVIEW OF TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS <br /> A developer pursuing a project on any site will consider several issues in determining <br /> how much density to provide. These considerations include market demand for the <br /> product, physical characteristics of the site, the cost of the site and the allowable <br /> development per the zoning code. If the developer chooses to develop the site at a <br /> density below that allowed by zoning, there is no reason to explore acquiring additional <br /> development rights. If the developer chooses to consider higher density, he will evaluate <br /> whether the increased value of the development justifies the costs of the additional <br /> development rights. With higher density of development, the cost of land per square foot <br /> of building area is lower. However, the construction cost is often higher, particularly <br /> when parking must be provided in a structure. At the same time, a higher density project <br /> may support higher rents because of secure parking, project amenities, and potentially <br /> better views. <br /> Cities find TDR attractive as a means of improving the economic feasibility of <br /> redevelopment in targeted receiving areas, where the City has already determined that it <br /> wants to encourage greater housing or non-residential density, such as in a downtown or <br /> near major transit facilities. Everett has 4 zones (B-3, BMU, E-1 and MUO) that provide <br /> for a density bonus using TDR, if the City and County agree to develop an inter- <br /> jurisdictional program. This report identifies the viability of TDR in these zones. <br /> There are established purchase and transfer of development rights programs in the region <br /> that provide experience in valuing development rights. Snohomish County has some <br /> experience with purchased development rights from rural areas, but no experience to date <br /> with redemption of those rights in urban areas. There has been a more active market in <br /> King County. A rural TDR credit equals two additional receiving site dwelling units, <br /> while an urban TDR equals one additional receiving site unit. There are many more <br /> transactions at the sending ends than actual redemptions at the receiving sites. The value <br /> of development rights as purchased in the private market is much lower than the price <br /> paid through the public programs at the sending end. Based on current market data, a <br /> sending site rural TDR credit is worth$15,000. <br /> ZONING ANALYSIS <br /> Residential development is allowed in single family, multifamily and commercial zones. <br /> Allowable density in multifamily zones ranges from 20 units per acre in the R3L zone to <br /> 58 units per acre in the R-4 zone, and is unlimited in the R-5 zone. Allowable densities <br /> in the commercial zones vary from 29 units per acre in the B2-B zone to 58 units per acre <br /> in the C-1 and B-2 zones, and are unlimited in the Broadway Mixed Use zone and the <br /> EYERETT TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS STUDY FINAL REPORT <br /> PROPERTY COUNSELORS PAGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.