Laserfiche WebLink
mechanism in 1972, which has since been raised to 0.6 percent. Metro operates its <br /> fixed-route service entirely in King County, but does provide vanpools for a number <br /> of King County residents commuting to Snohomish County employers and three <br /> custom buses to the Boeing plant from Renton, North Seattle, and Kirkland. Metro <br /> has a Board policy which essentially precludes them from providing inter-county <br /> service unless, as with custom buses, the fares cover the total operating costs. <br /> Vehicle-Based Programs <br /> Local Fixed-Route Service - Community Transit currently operates buses on 21 local, fixed <br /> routes in the PTBA. These routes serve the urban areas of the county, some suburban areas, <br /> and several small rural cities. Everett Transit currently operates 14 routes that serve the City <br /> of Everett and its immediate environs. Most routes operate seven days per week, but with <br /> reduced service hours on Saturdays and Sundays. Headways are typically 30-60 minutes and <br /> bus stops are located approximately every 1/4 mile. Routes serve major trip attractors and <br /> producers such as shopping malls, hospitals, nursing homes, community colleges, major <br /> employers, etc. The routes primarily serve persons who are transit dependent, that is <br /> persons who for one reason or another either cannot or choose not to drive. Once <br /> established, these local routes become the chief means of transportation for a distinct <br /> population, and changing routes can cause significant social impacts. <br /> For most persons commuting to work, travel time is the main factor in determining mode <br /> choice. Travel times on local routes are usually much greater than corresponding travel <br /> times for automobiles. Thus, in general, local fixed routes serve a very small percentage of <br /> commuters in the county and will play only a limited role in future commuter trip reduction. <br /> Many more commuters would use local transit service if the travel times were competitive <br /> with auto travel times. Arterial congestions does not necessarily improve the utility of the <br /> local transit mode because buses are caught in the same congestion as automobiles. <br /> Travel cost is an important, but secondary factor for most commuters in determining mode <br /> choice. Most commuters weigh their commute options based only on their direct, <br /> out-of-pocket travel costs, namely gasoline and parking for automobiles or fares for transit. <br /> Current gasoline costs are at their lowest levels since World War II in terms of proportion <br /> of income and in terms of absolute dollars (adjusted for inflation). Parking costs at most <br /> major Snohomish County employers are free. Thus cost factors currently work against local <br /> transit as a viable alternative to the automobile. <br /> Nevertheless, there are certain niches in which local service can compete. For those major <br /> employers who are already served by local routes a mode shift to transit may be induced by <br /> providing subsidies for fares. This is particularly true if auto users face parking costs at <br /> work. Even with such incentives only employees who happen to live close to the existing <br /> local routes are likely to shift to buses. Considering the county's low residential density, the <br /> number of such persons may be quite low. Over time some employees may choose to move <br /> to locations that take advantage of the local transit commute option. <br /> 21 <br />