My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 1925-93
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 1925-93
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:20:04 AM
Creation date
4/27/2017 11:19:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
1925-93
Date
1/27/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cities. ET and Community Transit have established interlocal agreements where PTBA <br /> residents traveling within the City of Everett may use ET's paratransit service, and Everett <br /> residents may use CT's demand-response transit service. <br /> By its nature, demand-response service will not be a major factor in commute trip reduction. <br /> Vanpool Programs - CT currently provides vans to any group of commuters wishing to form <br /> a vanpool. A minimum group of seven persons qualifies for an eight-passenger van, 10 <br /> persons for a 12-person van, and 13 persons for a 15-passenger van. The cost per person <br /> is based on the monthly mileage and includes operating costs and capital recoupment. <br /> Administrative costs are not captured by the fares. Metro also provides vans for a number <br /> of King County residents commuting to Snohomish County employers. <br /> Vanpools can compete very well with SOVs, especially for long commutes and in corridors <br /> with HOV facilities. The travel time for vanpools may be slightly greater than for SOVs <br /> because of the additional time to pick up passengers at their homes or for individuals to drive <br /> to a central meeting place. However, this loss of time can be compensated for by the ability <br /> of vanpool passengers to use their commute time to read, sleep, etc.. In addition, vanpool <br /> passengers are guaranteed a seat as opposed to commuters on some crowded express transit <br /> buses. The travel costs for vanpools are usually comparable to fares on transit express <br /> routes. For the smaller vans the fares are higher than for the larger vans. <br /> Vanpools work well in the Puget Sound Region because of the dispersed land use. Only the <br /> Seattle CBD, and to a lesser extent the University District and Bellevue, have employment <br /> concentrations large enough to support significant transit express service. Smaller <br /> employment centers like the Everett CBD, Lynnwood CBD, the Paine Field area, the Canyon <br /> Park area, and certain large employers, may be too small for transit routes but definitely <br /> large enough to support vanpools. <br /> The demand for vanpools currently outstrips the supply. Waiting lists exist, consisting of <br /> groups of people who want to vanpool, but for whom vans are not yet available. The <br /> limiting factor is the capital outlays necessary to purchase more vans. Community Transit <br /> relies on Federal programs for the initial capital outlays and to a lesser extent on capital <br /> recouped from the existing vanpools. <br /> Unlike transit bus services, Community Transit's vanpool services are not heavily subsidized <br /> by public revenues. Vanpools operate on a "break even" basis in which the revenues from <br /> the vanpool fares must pay for the operating costs and capital recovery. Only the <br /> administrative costs are subsidized. It has been argued that being the most fuel-efficient <br /> mode, vanpools deserve to be subsidized to a greater extent. Such subsidy would create even <br /> more demand for this service. <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.