Laserfiche WebLink
sitting over the Everett area. However, two more odor complaints were recorded in Everett at 11:30 and <br /> 13:04. Since the wind was now blowing steadily from the WSW, these complaints were considered to <br /> be meteorologically improbable. In addition, during this same time period, two odor complaints were <br /> recorded in Marysville, one at 10:48 and another at 11:06, which were deemed meteorologically <br /> possible since the residences were now downwind of Cedar Grove. The coincidence of these complaints <br /> being received on the same day and at roughly the same time means that the complaints in Marysville <br /> and Everett could not be caused by the same odor source, unless that source was located to the SW of <br /> the city of Everett. Figure 10 indicates the locations of the odor complaints and wind directions during <br /> the morning hours. <br /> FIGURE 10:Odor Com.faints Mornin• of June 11 <br /> 0 , <br /> �'.. r aft ± , <br /> \ '1 rµ . Jt E l C)0 <br /> k, AfM <br /> f• )•• <br /> • <br /> X70„7,1{{k'd'I 'tai ('7 _ <br /> ., I i•at....i \ EK '4,e : r <br /> iii , w+ ' <br /> len a Gale; er.,. .: .. •� F,e a 1 .551?a <br /> As discussed above, the meteorological conditions in Everett on the morning of June 11 indicate the <br /> source of the odor is most likely located somewhere in Everett and possibly to the SW of the complaints. <br /> Harbor Marine, TC System, Everett Navel Station, Everett Shipyards and Kimberly Clark Pulp and <br /> Paper Mill are all located within the City of Everett and downwind of the complainants. <br /> The review of the odor complaints for Everett also indicates that some individuals may be living right <br /> next to an odor source. One example involves a frequent complainant who lives in the City of Everett. <br /> - 36 - <br /> {00235104.DOC/3) <br />