My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011/09/14 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
2011/09/14 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2017 10:11:10 AM
Creation date
5/5/2017 10:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
9/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
New Evidence Confirms Dentists Controlled Statements by CDC <br /> On Fluoridation Toxicity Concerns <br /> Another King Family Member Speaks Out <br /> as Fluoridegate Scandal Builds in Atlanta <br /> http://fluoride-cla s s-action.com/alveda-king-andrew-young-against-fluoride <br /> Ellijay,GA—Swirling questions about conflicts of interest and improper influence grew rapidly today as Freedom of <br /> Information Act documents showed that since the 1970s,dental health professionals alone in the Centers for Disease Control <br /> (CDC)have controlled the agency's stance supporting water fluoridation. <br /> A response to a request for the names and job descriptions of all persons in CDC that have had input into CDC's decision to <br /> support fluoridation listed no CDC toxicologists,minority health professionals,experts in diabetes,or others outside the Oral <br /> Health Division. <br /> CDC says its administrative structure is set up to address what the agency calls"cross cutting issues."Yet only CDC's directors <br /> of oral health were listed over several decades as being responsible for the agency's fluoridation stance,a disquieting disclosure <br /> for water,health,and political leaders that believed CDC utilized its broad array of internal expertise in assessing research on <br /> whole-body,outside-the-mouth harm from fluoridation. <br /> The documentation intensifies focus on the motivations behind CDC's and EPA's fluoride safety statements that appear at odds <br /> with current scientific knowledge. <br /> After a 2006 report from the National Research Council documented extensive amounts of basic research never conducted on <br /> whole-body fluoride impacts,CDC continued promoting fluoridation while stating on its website,"Extensive research <br /> conducted over the past 60 years has shown that fluoridation of public water supplies is safe and effective for all community <br /> residents." <br /> The disclosures come as yet another prominent member of the Atlanta black community is calling for a halt to water <br /> fluoridation and highlighting concerns about the CDC's role in promoting it. <br /> Alveda King,nationally known minister and niece of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.,joins the civil rights leader's <br /> daughter,Bernice King, former Atlanta mayor and U.N.ambassador Andrew Young,and civil rights leader and minister Dr. <br /> Gerald Durley in drawing attention to risks from fluoridation. <br /> Alveda King posted information on her blog today. "The Centers for Disease Control has clearly been trying to preserve <br /> fluoridation at all costs,but the facts about fluoride harm are coming out anyway,"she says. <br /> "This is a civil rights issue,"she continues. "No one should be subjected to drinking fluoride in their water,especially sensitive <br /> groups like kidney patients and diabetics,babies in their milk formula, or poor families that cannot afford to purchase <br /> unfluoridated water. Black and Latino families are being disproportionately harmed." <br /> A growing body of published research shows that minorities,kidney patients,diabetics,babies and seniors are particularly at <br /> risk for harm from ingested fluorides. <br /> Law firms are now reviewing old and new documents believed to highlight a pattern of attempts to curtail discussions on <br /> fluoride toxicity and downplay the importance of professionals personally reviewing scientific reports about fluorides. <br /> One such document is an explosive transcript of a 1951 meeting of state dental directors on file at the Library of Congress. <br /> State dental leaders at the meeting were encouraged to promote fluoridation were told, "The question of toxicity is on the same <br /> order. Lay off it altogether.Just pass it over. 'We know there is absolutely no effect other than reducing tooth decay,' you say, <br /> and go on. If it becomes an issue,then you will have to take it over,but don't bring it up yourself." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.