Laserfiche WebLink
iv. Failure to consider cumulative effects. 24 <br /> 1 <br /> v. Inadequate development tracking and oversight. 26 <br /> vi. Failure to protect Channel Migration Zones... 28 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 vii. Failure to address state vesting loophole. 29 <br /> 5 viii.Permit-by-permit review was rejected as inadequate in <br /> the Key Deer case. 30 <br /> 6 3. FEMA Has Not Implemented RPA#4. 32 <br /> 7 <br /> 4. FEMA Has Not Implemented RPA#5. 32 <br /> 8 <br /> 5. FEMA Has Not Implemented RPA#6. 33 <br /> 9 <br /> 6. FEMA Has Not Implemented RPA#7. 33 <br /> 10 <br /> 7. Conclusion re. Jeopardy 34 <br /> 11 <br /> D. FEMA Is Violating the ESA's Prohibition on "Take". 35 <br /> 12 <br /> II. PLAINTIFF WILL BE IRREPARABLY HARMED WITHOUT AN <br /> 13 INJUNCTION 37 <br /> 14 A. Plaintiff Will Be Irreparably Harmed If FEMA Continues <br /> Implementing the NFIP in Puget Sound. 37 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 B. Plaintiff Seeks a Narrowly-Tailored Injunction. 38 <br /> 17 III. THE BALANCE OF HARMS AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST <br /> SUPPORT AN INJUNCTION. 39 <br /> 18 CONCLUSION 40 <br /> 19 <br /> 20 <br /> 21 <br /> 22 <br /> 23 <br /> 24 <br /> 25 <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Earthjustice <br /> PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 705 Second Ave.,Suite 203 <br /> Seattle, WA 98104 <br /> 28 INJUNCTION(Case No. 2:11-cv-02044-RSM) -ii- <br /> (206)343-7340 <br />