Resolution 7107 - Laserfiche WebLink

/IW RESOLUTION NO. 71°7 A RESOLUTION of the City of Everett Denying Proposed Amendmen s to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map Regarding COMP 16-002 and REZ 16-002 WHEREAS, Isaac Liu (Rich Trend Properties) submitted an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from 1.2 to 1.3, and an application to amend the Zoning Map from R-1 to R-1(A); and WHEREAS,the application was submitted on July 1, 2016 and was included on the docket of potential comprehensive plan amendments the city would consider in 2016- 2017; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the city of Everett reviewed the proposed amendments, received public input at a duly advertised public hearing, and found that: 1. A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)under the State Environmental Policy Act was issued on November 2, 2016 regarding the proposed action. 2. Notice of the application, SEPA determination and public hearing were provided as follows: a. A Notice of Public Hearing and Determination of Non-significance was published in the Everett Herald on November 4, 2016. b. A Notice of Public Hearing and Determination of Non-significance was sent to property owners within 500 feet of the proposal, neighborhood groups and those on the city's SEPA Notice mailing list. c. A 60-day notice to the Washington State Department of Commerce was provided on October 6, 2016. d. Two large signs (24"x 36") were posted on the property on November 5, 2016. 3. Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map must consider the factors outlined in Chapter 1, Introduction, Section VII.H of the Everett Comprehensive Plan, as follows: 1. The proposed land use designation must be supported by or consistent with the existing policies of the various elements of the comprehensive plan. 2. Have circumstances related to the subject property and the area in which it is located changed sufficiently since the adoption of the Land Use Element to justify a change to the land use designation? If so, the circumstances that have changed should be described in detail to support findings that a different land use designation is appropriate.