Laserfiche WebLink
22 <br /> This is an approximation based on 2012 numbers. <br /> 3. In terms of attorney caseload management,what is the city's method of counting probation <br /> violations and other post-resolution hearings? <br /> The number of probation cases in the preceding:table:is artificially high due to the way our <br /> municipal court handles probation reviews. Instead of holding review hearings only when the court <br /> has`been notified of a probationer's failure to comply by the probation department or a prosecutor's <br /> motion,the court holds regular review hearings at set intervals regardless of compliance status. A <br /> public defender is present at every review calendar. When an indigent probationer has failed to <br /> comply,the public defender will typically ask for a continuance to another review date and in the <br /> interim work with the probationer to get them on track and compliant and represent them at the <br /> continued review hearing. The majority of review hearings involve no more than the probation <br /> officer informing the court that there have been no violations by that particular defendant. A fully <br /> compliant defendant will have several review hearings in the course of their probation and a public <br /> defender is present for each hearing. The number of hearings that involve alleged noncompliance <br /> has not been separately tracked but is much smaller than the total shown in the table. <br /> 4. Did the city receive.RCW 10.101 grant money during calendar y602012? No. If so,has <br /> the city submitted its 2012 mid-year report on the use of the MAO? ( )Yes (:)'Vo If no,please <br /> explain the situation. <br /> 5. How much grant funding isvthe city requesting? $150,000: Indicate in the table below how the <br /> city intends to use public: efeifse`` rant fiindi.i'g 2Q113,`.:ifil ttach anarrative paragraph detailing <br /> how the city will use the grant fun link to impro indigent defense services: (The table below <br /> '+' "` .shed policyfor an expanded list of allowed <br /> •il:'r. <br /> reflects the most comtnoi;u�es of funds. See the<'� �. p <br /> and prohibited uses.) Note4_ at.grartfs;cannot be used_;to supplant city funds that were being spent <br /> on public defense's ivlces prii :t'c:;the intra td sbursefi:ent of state funds. <br /> Con bm Allowed'TJses of U apt Funding' <br /> Creating a`city.•or regional pi blic defer se agency <br /> Providing gixal ty.monitoring'1 y;an attofhey coordinator who monitors contract <br /> attorneys provi0i public defense <br /> Y''•' c'defense caseloads X <br /> Adding attorneys fo::lQwer pule <br /> defense <br /> investigator services' <br /> Adding expert services lei <br /> Increasing public defense attorney compensation <br /> Providing public defense services at preliminary appearance calendars <br /> Providing interpreter services for attorney-client interviews and communications <br /> Other(please explain) <br /> 6. If the city has public defense contracts,fill out the Table of Public Defense Contracts (Table I), <br /> and provide a copy of each current contract in alphabetical order by attorney name. If possible, <br /> 3 <br /> 209 <br />